Judgment[1993] KEHC 94
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…order for stay of execution shall be made under sub rule (1) unless – (a) the Court is satisfied that substantial loss may result to the applicant unless the order is made and that the application has been made without unreasonable…
…delay; and (b) such security as the Court orders for the due performance of such decree or order as may ultimately be binding on him has been given by the applicant.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…For an application for stay to succeed, the applicant has to satisfy the court that substantial loss may result unless the order is made and that the application has been made without unreasonable delay.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…No order for stay of execution shall be made under sub-rule (1) unless- (a) the court is satisfied that substantial loss may result to the applicant unless the order is made and that the application has been made without unreasonable…
…delay and (b) such security as the court orders for the due performance of such decree or order as may ultimately be binding on him has been given by the applicant.”…
Division and case type: Environment and LandLand Case
…That the application has been made without unreasonable delay. (3). That the substantial loss may result to the applicant unless the order is made. (4).…
Division and case type: Environment and LandLand Case
…That the application has been made without unreasonable delay. (3). That the substantial loss may result to the applicant unless the order is made. (4).…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…It is noted, also, that the Rules (Order XLIV R 1 (b) require application forReview to be made without unreasonable delay. Yet here, the judgment to bereviewed was delivered over 10 years ago.…
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
…Respondents filed grounds of opposition dated 23rd July, 2007 in which six grounds are raised in the following terms. 1) The application is incompetent and does not lie. 2) The application has been brought after an inordinate and unreasonable…
…delay. 3) The application is without merit, and is calculated to dealy the expeditious determination of this matter, which delay shall prejudice the Defendants greatly. 4) The Plaintiffs would not suffer any prejudice if…
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
…Respondents filed grounds of opposition dated 23rd July, 2007 in which six grounds are raised in the following terms. 1) The application is incompetent and does not lie. 2) The application has been brought after an inordinate and unreasonable…
…delay. 3) The application is without merit, and is calculated to dealy the expeditious determination of this matter, which delay shall prejudice the Defendants greatly. 4) The Plaintiffs would not suffer any prejudice if…