Judgment[1998] KEHC 34
PETER NGANGA MUIRURI v CREDIT (K) LIMITED
High Court at Nairobi
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
Wamalwa & Company Advocates were not able to meet those requirements. They had to get the Order varied so that they can use another Bank.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1376 OF 1995 AHMED MEERA SHIAB DEEN.....................................PLAINTIFF versus MARY WANGUI..............................................................DEFENDANT R U L I N G The defendant/applicant has moved the court by way of Chamber Summons under Order 9A Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Rules for an order that the ex-parte judgment entered in default of defence on 19th March, 1996 be set aside and that she be al
Division and case type: Environment and LandLand Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI 224 OF 1997 BETWEEN 1.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: PALL J.A (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI 372 OF 1996 BETWEEN DAVID KONGO .......................................................
Division and case type: Environment and LandLand Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: OMOLO, AKIWUMI & PALL, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 284 OF 1997 (UR.120/97) BETWEEN EZRA ODONDI OPAR ........................................APPLICANT AND TOTAL KENYA LIMITED ....................................RESPONDENT (Application for an order of a temporary injunction to restrain the Respondent from retaking possession of the Kendu Bay Total Service Station the subject matter of the Applicant's intended Appeal and to Restrain the R
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
registered proprietor of land and no more. An encumbrance like a lease or a caution or a prohibitory order does not give the person who has registered the encumbrance or a proprietory ownership o the piece of land affected.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 2069 OF 1996 KEMFRO (A) LTD...............................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO. 630 OF 1996 KARL JENNING ……………….……………………………..
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1426 OF 1993 ELIUS GACHII KARANJA .................................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA ALFARUS MULI .......................................... LAVUTA DODHIA STORES .........................................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI H.C.C.CIVIL CASE NO.597 OF 1990 JANE WANJA MWANGI .................................. PLAINTIFF VERSUS NAIROBI CITY COMMISSION ...........................
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
so that if the court subsequently adopts that award it may be difficult to execute the resultant order especially at the Land Registry. Learned counsels in this matter do not seem to see all these.Counsel for the applicant is only complaining at the Arbitrator’s misconduct.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 120 OF 1996 KIATHI TRADING CO.
Division and case type: CIVIL DIVISIONCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO 2959 OF 1996 Hassan & 4 others v Kenya Wildlife Service Injunction – temporary injunction – principles that guide the court in granting an injunction – grant of injunction against removal of a rare and endangered species from its natural habitat - preservation of wild animals in their natural habitat. Wildlife – statutory powers of Kenya Wildlife Service – Wildlife (Conservation & Management) Act (cap 386) s
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NUMBER 101 OF 1996 FULCHAND MANEK & BROTHERS…………………………..………PLAINTIFF VERSUS BULLION BANK LIMITED……………………………………………….DEFENDANT RULING There being no denial by the Defendant/Respondent that the cheques on which the applicant’s account was debited did not belong to the plaintiff/applicant as deposed in paragraphs 5 – 9 of the affidavit in support of the application for summary judgment, I am of the view that the defence filed a hall
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS Civil Appeal 64 of 1995 CHAIRMAN & SECRETARY TABLIGH FLYSABULLAHI MARKAZ SELF HELP GROUP..APPELLANTS VERSUS DAVID MOTUKU NZAU …………….................................................................……...…..…… RESPONDENT Corum: J. Nzei Advocate for Appellant/Applicant Mr.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 2213 OF 1991 DEVA SAMAT KESHWALA & 10 OTHERS.....................APPLICANTS VERSUS TOLK INVESTMENTS (K) LTD..........................................DEFENDANT UNITED NATIONS FOOD PROGRAMME...........................DEFENDANT RULING On the 15.12.92 I dismissed the application filed by the second defendant on 10.2.92. That application sought an order that the name of the second defendant be struck out and the suit against the
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 1676 OF 1995 ROSEMARY WANJIKU KINYANJUI …………..PLAINTIFF VERSUS MARTIN WAINAINA KINYAJUI……….....….RESPONDENT RULING OF THE COURT Before the 24th October, 1995, I had considered the application before me and said as follows: “The parties herein have been in matrimony for thirty one years. They have materially prospered together and can without embellishment be said to be quite rich.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 706 OF 1992 DIONYSIUS OMAMBIA ONYINKWA...................PLAINTIFF VERSUS KENYA PORTS AUTHORITY.............................DEFENDANT RULING The plaintiff herein alleged in his plaint that he was so unlawfully dismissed from his employment with the defendant that he should be awarded compensatory damages by this Court. In the course of his evidence he vehemently denied or rejected the defence’s contention that his conduct ha
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
The respondents swear that they were prepared to accept the applicants papers if they were in order despite the order from the Chief Magistrate, Nakuru if the same were presented within the prescribed time. No attempt was made to present the papers within the prescribed time.