Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: High Court CivilCivil Appeal
…On the first ground, as to whether the Appellant proved her case on a balance of probabilities, she stated that, being a civil case, the burden of proof was on a balance of probabilities and cited Palace Investment Ltd v…
…The burden of proof was on the plaintiff, and she had to prove her case on a balance of probabilities.…
Division and case type: High Court DivCivil Appeal
…The Appellant argued that the standard of proof in civil cases is on a balance of probabilities. The question of what amounts to proof on a balance of probabilities was discussed by Kimaru, J in William Kabogo Gitau v.…
…The Appellant simply failed to prove its case to the required standard on a balance of probabilities, leaving the Adjudicator with no option but to dismiss the claim.…
Division and case type: High Court Civil Appellate DivisionCivil Appeal
…In a judgment dated 15th July 2022, the trial court found that the appellants had not proved their case on a balance of probabilities and proceeded to dismiss the suit. 3.…
…of probabilities.…
Division and case type: High Court DivCivil Appeal
…of probabilities.…
…it as higher than a balance of probabilities.…
Division and case type: High Court DivCivil Appeal
…I thus find that the appellant proved negligence against the respondent on the balance of probabilities, and it is 100% liability. I so hold.…
…In my view, the claim for loss of use of the vehicle of Kshs. 10,000/= per day was not proved by the appellant on the balance of probabilities.…
Division and case type: High Court DivCivil Appeal
…The burden of proof lay on the Appellant/Plaintiff, to prove his case on a balance of probabilities.…
…That is what is called the balance of probabilities.…
Division and case type: High Court DivCivil Appeal
…of probabilities. 5.…
…The Respondent contends that the Appellant failed to prove her case on a balance of probabilities.…
Division and case type: High Court CivilCivil Appeal
…The 2 nd Respondent submitted that the trial court correctly found that the Appellant failed to discharge the burden of proof on a balance of probabilities. 39.…
…She argued that the court did not impose any higher threshold than the required standard of proof on a balance of probabilities. 42.…
Division and case type: High Court DivCivil Appeal
…Submissions 9.Learned Counsel for the Appellant submitted that the Appellant who was a fare paying passenger proved on a balance of probabilities that the accident occurred; that it was as a result of negligence on the part…
…of probabilities, that no evidence was adduced to prove negligence against their driver.…
Division and case type: High Court CivilCivil Appeal
…In her judgment, the trial adjudicator found in favour of the respondents and stated that they had proved their case on a balance of probabilities whereas the appellant failed to prove his counterclaim.…
…quality machine cut blocks out of 5 and did not the respondents. c) The learned trial magistrate erred in law and in fact in failing to find that the appellant had proved his counter claim on a balance of probabilities against…
Division and case type: High Court DivCivil Appeal
…Whether the Appellant/Claimant proved his case on a balance of probability. b.…
…Whether the Appellant/Claimant proved his case on a balance of probability. 8.…
Division and case type: High Court DivCivil Appeal
…THAT the learned judge erred in law and fact by concluding that the Respondent had proved its case on a balance of probability.…
…Whether the Respondent proved, on a balance of probabilities, that the funds were transferred into the Appellant’s account.…
Division and case type: High Court DivCivil Appeal
…of probabilities.…
…It must always be remembered that the balance of proof on the appellant was at all times on a balance of probabilities and not higher.…
Division and case type: High Court Civil Appellate DivisionCivil Appeal
…ANALYSIS AND DETERMINATION The crux of this appeal lies in whether the respondent proved his case on a balance of probabilities. The respondent’s case was that the appellant was a beneficial owner.…
…A plaintiff must prove its case too upon a balance of probability whether the evidence in unchallenged or not. (See Kirugi and Another v Kabiya and Others [1983] e KLR). 13.…
Division and case type: High Court DivCivil Appeal
…A plaintiff must prove its c[sic] too upon a balance of probability whether the evidence in unchallenged or not. 20.…
…of probabilities is not correct.…
Division and case type: High Court DivCivil Appeal
…He submits that he proved his case sufficiently on the balance of probability save for the rule of evidence. 6.…
…(ii)whether the appellant proved his case on a balance of probabilities 18.…
Division and case type: High Court DivCivil Appeal
…He relied on oral testimony and community recognition as sufficient proof of paternity on the balance of probabilities and contended that DNA is not mandatory.…
…The standard of proof in civil and succession matters is on a balance of probabilities.…
Division and case type: High Court DivCivil Appeal
…The standard of proof on a balance of probabilities has been explained in various decisions.…
…of probability. b) The balance of probability standard means that the Court must be satisfied that the event in question is more likely than not to have occurred. c) The balance of probability standard is a flexible standard…
Division and case type: High Court DivCivil Appeal
…As such, the trial court was properly guided by the standard of proof on a balance of probabilities, and the Appellant’s claim that he made full payment remained speculative.…
…In light of the evidence presented and the explanations provided, I am satisfied that the Respondent proved its claim on a balance of probabilities.…
Division and case type: High Court DivCivil Appeal
…The standard of proof on a balance of probabilities has been explained in various decisions.…
…of probability.…