Judgment[2017] KEHC 1665
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: COMMERCIAL DIVISIONJudicial Review
…In urging for a remedy for the violations of his fundamental rights, the appellant relied on Article 21 of the Constitution that imposes a duty on the State and every State organ to ensure that fundamental rights are not…
…rights are based on the proceedings in Cr.…
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsConstitutional Petition
…That as I appear in court, there are two Title deeds over the same suit property whose effects is to interfere with my fundamental rights to own the suit property.”…
…Clearly the issue of interference with the Petitioner's “fundamental rights to own the suit property” will only arise after a determination by the court that his title, as against that of the 1st Respondent, is the valid…
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsConstitutional Petition
…Following the outcome of the committee on the power of mercy, unlike other constitutional petitions on re-sentencing, in particular on the death penalty, he continued that his fundamental rights and freedoms have been infringed…
…Notwithstanding this statement where the purpose and effect of exercising the prerogative of mercy judicial review may be appropriately invoked to enforce the fundamental rights guaranteed by the constitution.…