Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS Civil Suit 3512 of 1990 PRUDENTIAL FINANCE LIMITED........................... PLAINTIFF VERSUS JOHNSON NGANGA MBUGUA............................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO 2604 OF 1988 DAVID MUOLA …………………………………….....…… PLAINTIFF VERSUS EAST AFRICAN PACKAGING LIMITED …….….........RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO 2552 OF 1987 JAMES MUTULU OKUNNE ………………………………… PLAINTIFF VERSUS NZOIA SUGAR COMPANY LTD & ANOTHER….............DEFENDANTS
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO 3086 OF 1989 ROBERT LETAPIN OLE KIDOTU...........................PLAINTIFF VERSUS STEPHEN MUIRURI...........................................RESPONDENT RULING The objector herein, Loise Njoki Murathi seeks release of a motor vehicle, KZZ 658 attached at the instance of the plaintiff herein, Mr Kidotu for a debt owed by the defendant Mr Muiruri who is the husband of the objector. The application is supported by an affidavit swo
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) CIVIL SUIT 4147 OF 1986 PETER MUATHE NGUVI ………………………..PLAINTIFF versus MASINYA MUTUA………...……….……………DEFENDANT
Division and case type: Anti-CorruptionCivil Suit
may have at least equal rights with him if not superior rights over the property. Consequently I will order that the suit premises remain locked, but after the applicants are given an opportunity to take away from inside the premises what is justly theirs.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO 2836 OF 1990 TRICOR ENTERPRISES LTD & 2 OTHERS..…………APPLICANTS VERSUS ANNE NYAWACHA MWOK-HANDA ………….….. RESPONDENTS RULING A short history of the matter: On the 11th June, 1990, the plaintiff/ applicants filed a plaint in the registry of the court.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA CIVIL SUIT NO 496 OF 1988 RANDU NZAU ……………..…………….….. APPLICANT VERSUS MBUNI TRANSPORT CO LTD…....….…..
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
property ie Nairobi (Block 106 /242 (House No 203) until the determination of this suit or further orders of this court. Costs of this application to be costs in the cause.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO 4925 OF 1988 ELIUD OKIRING FREDRICK EPOLOTO ZAKAYO EPUS ……………………………….....….. APPLICANTS VERSUS ISAAC NAMANGO J S KIAKULA ………………….…………………..RESPONDENTS RULING The plaintiffs are practicing priests under the Diocese of Nambale in the Church of the Province of Kenya (hereinafter called CPK).
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO 1795 OF 1987 PAN AFRICAN CREDIT & FINANCE LTD...........PLAINTIFF VERSUS FRICMILLS INTERNATIONAL LTD.................DEFENDANT RULING January 11, 1989 Pall J delivered the following Ruling. The plaintiff has filed this application for a summary judgment against the defendant in respect of the plaintiff’s claim in the plaint for Kshs 1,795,595.85 together with interest thereon at 19% and costs.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO 665 OF 1988 B M MWANZA …………………..…… PLAINTIFF VERSUS JOHNSTONE MAKAU……………… DEFENDANT RULING The plaintiff who is a quantity surveyor has filed this suit to recover his professional fees from the defendant. The defendant by his defence has disputed the plaintiff’s claim.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CIVIL MISC APPL 136 OF 1986 JOSHUA CHEGE WANYOIKE ……………………………………….….. APPLICANT AND JAMES THIGA MUKURO …………………………..……...…………… RESPONDENT (Application for extension of time to serve the record of appeal and the appeal be admitted of time at the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru ( Masime J ) dated December 3, 1983 In High Court Civil Case No 235 of 1982 RULING The applicant was duly served with the notice for the hearing of the application but did not atten
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO 2779 OF 1984 MORRIS MWANGI ……. PLAINTIFF versus WILFRED MUTURI …………..
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA COURT OF APPEAL, AT KISUMU CIVIL APPLICATION NO NAI 116 OF 1985 Madhupaper International Limited versus Kerr (application from the High Court at Nairobi, O’Connor J, Civil Suit 3438 of 1985) December 16, 1985, Kneller, Nyarangi JJA & Gachuhi Ag JA delivered the following Order of the Court. Madhupaper International Limited, the company, manufacturers cartons, tissues and lavatory paper in the industrial area of Nairobi.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
Republic of Kenya High Court, at Nairobi Civil Suit No 1745 of 1984 Okallo v Attorney General November 28, 1985, Owuor J delivered the following Judgment. On June 26, 1984 the plaintiff Omende Okallo filed a suit against the Attorney General as 1st Defendant and one Peter Oyaro 2nd defendant the driver of 5 KAF 75 owned by the Ministry of Defence and the one that allegedly knocked down the plaintiff along Juja road in Nairobi.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (Coram: Hancox, Nyarangi JJA & Gachuhi Ag JA CIVIL APPLICATION NO NAI 41 OF 1985 Between BATHOLOMEW MUYALE .............................APPLICANT AND SHEM NYAMBASI MULEFU ...........................DEFENDANT ELIJA NANDI CHIKAMAI................................DEFENDANT (In an intended appeal from an order of the High Court at Kakamega, Aganyanya J in Civil Suit No 13 of 1979) *************************
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
proceedings and the amendment of the pleadings, and the position in the instant case is governed by order 1 rule 10. At the time the name of the present defendant was added the plaintiff had lost the right to sue her.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
Esso Standard Kenya Ltd v Onesmus Kihara Mwangi Court of Appeal, at Nairobi June 5, 1985 Hancox JA, Platt & Gachuhi Ag JJA Civil Application No NAI 29 of 1984 (Application from the High Court at Nairobi, Nyarangi J) Appeal – delay in filing–– letter to Registrar requesting for precedings not copied to respondent – Rule 81 (2) Court of Appeal Rules. Nyarangi J as he then was on July 18, 1980 gave judgment in favour of the Esso Standard Kenya (no plaintiff) the defendant filed notice of appeal o
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Highway Carriers Ltd v Mahrus High Court, at Mombasa May 12, 1985 Aragon J Civil Suit No 494 of 1976 May 12, 1985, Aragon J delivered the following Judgment. In October 1975 Tononoka Haulage Contractors agreed with a subsidiary of the United Nations organization called the World Food Programme to carry some drums of oil from Mombasa to Kigali in Ruanda.