Judgment[2021] KEHC 1014
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
…REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL REVISION NO E106 OF 2021 ELIUD MWANIKI WAWERU.............................................................................1ST APPLICANT RAFIKI DEPOSIT TAKING…
…reminded that under section 9 of the Victim Protection Act of 2014, they have a right to participate in the trial process to protect their interests; since the applicants are mortgagors in relation to the mortgagee (Rafiki Deposit…
Division and case type: FamilySuccession Cause
…of deposit of the decretal sum.…
…There is no allegation in the supporting affidavit that the Judgment-Debtor cannot afford to deposit the decretal sum as ordered, or that such deposit will so affect its operations as to amount to a fetter on prosecution…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
…Procedure Act, Cap.21 Laws of Kenya and Order 51 praying for the substantive orders that the court to amend the arithmetical error in the judgment and the court to extent the time within which the sum calculated is to be deposited…
…That consequential to the correction of the error the respondent should deposit in an interest earning account Kshs.875,996.00 and not Kshs.1,040,589.00 as erroneously computed in the judgment.…
Division and case type: FamilySuccession Cause
…urged the court to rectify the petition for grant of letters of administration to reflect as a liability due and owing from the deceased’s estate a sum of Kshs.3,090,000/- received by the deceased from the applicant as a deposit…
…Maina, a director of the applicant company and was made on the grounds that the deceased received a sum of Kshs.3,090,000/- from the applicant as a deposit towards purchase of a parcel of land measuring 185 acres that was…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
…Procedure Act, Cap.21 Laws of Kenya and Order 51 praying for the substantive orders that the court to amend the arithmetical error in the judgment and the court to extent the time within which the sum calculated is to be deposited…
…That consequential to the correction of the error the respondent should deposit in an interest earning account Kshs.875,996.00 and not Kshs.1,040,589.00 as erroneously computed in the judgment.…
Division and case type: FamilySuccession Cause
…Procedure Act, Cap.21 Laws of Kenya and Order 51 praying for the substantive orders that the court to amend the arithmetical error in the judgment and the court to extent the time within which the sum calculated is to be deposited…
…That consequential to the correction of the error the respondent should deposit in an interest earning account Kshs.875,996.00 and not Kshs.1,040,589.00 as erroneously computed in the judgment.…