Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
Mugogo v Sihowa (Civil Appeal 39 of 1986) [1988] KECA 101 (KLR) (19 January 1988) (Judgment) Mugogo v Sihowa [1988] eKLR Neutral citation: [1988] KECA 101 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU CIVIL APPEAL 39 OF 1986 JO NYARANGI, JM GACHUHI & FK APALOO, JJA JANUARY 19, 1988 BETWEEN MUGOGO .................................................................................................. APPELLANT AND SIHOWA .......................................................................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: MASIME JA, GICHERU & KWACH Ag JJA) CIVIL APPEAL NO 57 OF 1985 BETWEEN MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SA...................................................... APPELLANT AND KENYA ALLIANCE INSURANCE WHEAT BOARD OF KENYA THE MV PANTERA.................................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT KISUMU CIVIL APPEAL NO 130 OF 1986 RICHARD SAIDI ………………..…….APPELLANT V SEMBI MOTORS…………….……RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (CORAM: NYARANGI, PLATT & APALOO JJA) CIVIL APPEAL NO 122 OF 1986 SHADRACK ARAP BAIYWO ………………………… APPELLANT VERSUS BODI BACH ………………………………….........…..RESPONDENT (Appeal from the High Court at Kisumu, Butler-Sloss J)
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: PLATT, APALOO JJA & MASIME Ag JA) CIVIL APPEAL NO 67 OF 1985 SECURICOR (KENYA) LIMITED…….......…………………….APPLICANT VERSUS EA DRAPERS LIMITED …………………….……….....1ST DEFENDANT COMBINED WAREHOUSES LIMITED…..……….…..1ST DEFENDANT (Appeal from the High Court at Mombasa, Bhandari J) RULING The applicant Securicor (K) Limited, gave notice on October 21 1986 that it would move the court for an order that leave be granted to the applicant, to amend the applicant’s
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
aspect is that the bank has not stated in any affidavit that it would be prepared to pay damages of the order of Kshs 20,000,000. These days the World Bank is not necessarily a password for financial liquity.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: NYARANGI, GACHUHI & APALOO JJA) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 64 OF 1985 PATEL …………….…..............…….APPELLANT VERSUS SINGH ………..……………….....…..DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPEALS NO 79 & 80 OF 1987 NATIONAL DRYCLEANERS LTD & ANOTHER …..…….……APPELLANTS VERSUS NDUNE……………………………………….....….………..RESPONDENTS RULING The Notice of Motion filed in civil appeal No 79 of 1979 (which application is dated 9th June 1987 and filed on 10th June 1987) was by consent of counsel heard together with a similar application in civil appeal No 80 of 1987. I heard the applications on 16th June, 1987 and in view of the urgency of the m
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: NYARANGI, PLATT & GACHUHI JJA) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI 18 OF 1987 OTIENO……………………………… APPLICANT VERSUS OUGO & ANOTHER….…………..RESPONDENT (Application for stay of execution pending an appeal in the High Court at Nairobi, Bosire J)
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA CORAM: MILLER CJ, NYARANGI & PLATT JJ A CIVIL APPEAL NO. 92 OF 1986 ALOYCE MARIERA ………………………........… APPELLANT VERSUS KENYA BUS SERVICES (MSA) LTD…………..….DEFENDANT (Appeal from the High Court at Mombasa, Bhandari J)
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL, AT NAIROBI (CORAM: NYARANGI, PLATT & APALOO JJA) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 38 OF 1985 KARANJA …………………………………………………….APPELLANT VERSUS INTER CONTINENTAL HOTEL & ANOTHER….......…..RESPONDENTS
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPEAL NO. 31 OF 1987 VIRGINIA EDITH WAMBUI OTIENO..…….………APPLICANT VERSUS JOASH OUGO & ANOTHER………….…......…RESPONDENT RULING.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (CORAM: PLATT, GACHUHI & APALOO JJA) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 95 OF 1985 MICHAEL A O MASHERE ………........……….……..APPELLANT VERSUS ROTAS MAKOKHA WALUSALA…………..…….
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT KISUMU CIVIL APPEAL NO 108 OF 1985 SIMON ODINGA……………………………………APPELLANT V CHARLES SANDE….………………….………..RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
The defendants thereafter hurried to this court and successfully sought the injunction and order granted on January 7, 1987 pending the hearing of the interlocutory appeal. The defendants will have none of that and so through their advocate Mr Kwach have appealed to this court on the following grounds: (1) That the learned judge erred in law in granting the respondent an indefinite ex parte injunction against the appellants without giving the appellants the benefit of a hearing inter partes; (2
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NYERI (CORAM: KNELLER, NYARANGI JJA & GACHUHI Ag JA) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 105 OF 1985 JAMES NDUHIU MACHARIA ……...…………….……APPELLANT VERSUS MWOTIA MACHARIA ……………………..……….RESPONDENT (Appeal from a Ruling and Order at the High Court at Nyeri, Patel J)
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (Coram: Hancox, Nyarangi and Platt, JJ A) CIVIL APPEAL NO 49 OF 1984 BETWEEN ABDALLA HUSSEIN KILO………………………………….……….. APPELLANT AND KOMBO KASSIM OMAR IDA-SA-GODANA RANCHING CO-OP SOCIETY…....……….…RESPONDENTS (Appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Mombasa (Bhandari, J) dated October 13, 1983 In High Court Civil Case No 26 of 1983) ________________ JUDGMENT OF HANCOX, J A I have had the advantage of reading in draft the judgment of Platt,
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Kneller, Nyarangi, JJ A and Gachuhi, Ag J A) CIVIL APPEAL 5 OF 1984 BETWEEN BAKSHISH SINGH & BROTHERS ………….………...............…………….. APPELLANTS AND PANAFRIC HOTELS LIMITED ………..…………….....................…………..
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
application through an advocate seeking for review of the judgment and prayer for consequential orders after the judgment to be set aside and the case to be heard on merit. The application was grounded on the fact that they being some of the defendants they were not summoned to appear before the arbitration panel and that judgment was given against them and were made to pay costs in a matter which they had not heard.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (Coram:Kneller, Hancox & Nyarangi JJA) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2 OF 1986 BETWEEN MOHAMED MAHMOUD JABANE............................................................APPELLANT AND HIGHSTONE BUTTY TONGOI OLENJA................................................RESPONDENT JUDGMENT OF HANCOX JA.