Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…RESPONDENT J U D G M E N T CORAM O’KUBSU J D N Ngatia for Appellant C W Gtonye (Principal State Counsel) for Respondent J U D G M E N T The appellant was convicted on the following two counts: - (i) Forgery contrary to section…
…The learned Resident Magistrate gave reasons why he reached his conclusion Section 345 of the Penal Code provides:- “Forgery is the making of a false document with intent to defraud or to deceive”.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…As already stated the appellant was convicted on the second count of forgery. Mr Gatimu, the learned counsel for the appellant presented to us what may be described, a novel argument.…
…He submitted that if a person is acquitted if forgery he cannot be found guilty of uttering a false document. There is no substance in this submission.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…Forgery contrary to section 349 of the Penal Code. 2. Uttering false documents contrary to section 353 of the Penal code. 3. Obtaining by false pretences contrary to section 313 of the Penal Code.…
…Learned Senior State counsel, Mar Harwood did not support convictions on the forgery and utterings, counts, properly so in view, for the simple reason that they were defective having changed the foring and uttering of three…
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
…The appellant was acquitted of the counts charging him with the theft of the cheque leaves, the forgery and the uttering of the forged cheque; and, no nding was made on count 5 charging him with theft of the sum withdrawn…