Judgment[1994] KEHC 94
Julius Kabutha Mau v Republic
High Court at Nairobi
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 526 OF 1992 JULIUS KABUTHA MAU.......................................................................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC...........................................................................................RESPONDENT (From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No 4932 of 1990 of the Principal Magistrate’s Court - Thika - E O Awino, Esq)
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Nzuki v Republic High Court, at Mombasa May 11, 1992 Wambilyangah J Criminal Appeal No. 7 of 1992 May 11, 1992, Wambilyanga J delivered the following Judgment.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
had been delivered to the said National Cereals and Produce Board Mombasa Depot on account of orders given to M/S Lotus Commercial Complex Ltd and Kenya Phonic Travels and Safaris Ltd. On or about the 28th day of May, 1988 at Mombasa within the Coast Province, stole Kshs 10,865,225/= which had been entrusted to him by M/s Kenya Phonic Travels and Safaris Ltd for him to apply for the purpose of procuring and supplying a part of an order of 2.9 million new gunny bags to the National Cereals and P
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Gicheru & Kwach JJ A) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 54 OF 1989 ODHIAMBO OLEL …………….……. APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC………………………….
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
conviction of each of the appellants and set aside the sentence that was imposed on each of them. I order that each of them shall be set free and be released forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 1390 OF 1991 JOHN AWITI KADO …………..………. APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC………………………..…..
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 308 OF 1992 ALPHONSE MUSAU MUTISO……… APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC……….…………...….….. RESPONDENT (From the Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No 1696 of 1991 of S Resident Magistrate’s Court at Malindi: J R Karanja Esq)
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIG COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 1428 OF 1990 LEONARD SOLOO RINGOS ......................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC.....................................................RESPONDENT (From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No 1685 of 1986 of the Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court at Nakuru: O G Githinji: Esq)
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Gachuhi, Gicheru & Cockar JJ A) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 89 OF 1990 BETWEEN PETER LEO BARAZA..............................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................RESPONDENT (An Appeal from the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Potter & Mbaluto, JJ) dated the 27th day of July, 1990 in HCCrA No 1995 of 1988) **********************
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 913 OF 1989 PETER MUSABI KIHINGU...........................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC..................................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI Criminal Appeal 5 of 1992 FRANCIS NGIGI GATHUGU ………………………….. APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC …………………………………………….
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 169 OF 1990 NAGIGI MARIGA..............................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC.........................................RESPONDENT (From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No 198 of 1990 of the Resident Magistrate’s Court at Nairobi O G Githinji)
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
Court had analysed this evidence in depth, they would most probably have come to the same conclusion as we have. As a result of this, we consider the convictions of these three appellants to be unsafe and should not be allowed to stand.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Tui v Republic High Court, at Nairobi May 29, 1991 Porter & Mbaluto JJ Criminal Appeal No 1259 of 1989 Criminal law – causing death by dangerous driving – whether merely alleging high speed is sufficient - failure to call expert evidence to show that speed may have been implied by the length of the skid marks - whether charge proved beyond reasonable doubt. The appellant was convicted in a Magistrate’s Court for the offence of causing death by dangerous driving and sentenced to
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 61 OF 1989 Kangethe..........................................................appellant v Republic......................................................respondent Judgment. The appellant in this case was charged before the chief magistrate’s court Nairobi, in two counts with stealing by clerk contrary to section 281 of the Penal Code.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Masime, Gicheru & Kwach JJ A) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 74 OF 1989 Between PETER MBURU KANGETHE................................... APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC.............................................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 1152 OF 1988 BETWEEN ALI............................................................... APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC..............................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEALS NOS 976 & 977 OF 1986 (CONSOLIDATED) BETWEEN KINYANJUI & 2 OTHERS............................. APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC......................................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 1028 OF 1987 BETWEEN KIMANI..................................... APPELLANT V REPUBLIC.................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
Provided that after conviction and before passing sentence or making any order the court may permit or require the complainant to outline to the court the facts upon which the charge is founded.” Reading S 72 of the Constitution and S 207 of the Criminal Procedure Code together, we continue in the view that the court is to sentence the accused only for the offence with which he is charged, and that the facts to be given are the facts relating to that charge. If the prosecution wish to have the a