Judgment[1983] KEHC 31
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
…of the evidence of the five prosecution witnesses whose evidence we have just referred to and who should be considered as accomplices but whose evidence we believe what the accused is alleged to have said in his inquiry…
…The inspector gave evidence as did the accused.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…As regards the evidence in support of the prosecution case the court below relied on the identification of the appellant by both PW 1 and PW 2.…
…The learned trial magistrate considered all the evidence before him and including the appellant’s defence and was satisfied on the basis of that evidence that it was the appellant who snatched the complainant’s property.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…As regards the evidence in support of the prosecution case the court below relied on the identification of the appellant by both PW 1 and PW 2.…
…The learned trial magistrate considered all the evidence before him and including the appellant’s defence and was satisfied on the basis of that evidence that it was the appellant who snatched the complainant’s property.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…Even upto today before me, there has not been evidence to show who the owner of that maize is and it will not be proper for me to work on assumption as to that ownership for the purpose of ordering release of that maize to…