Search court decisions

…APPELLANT AND DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS ....................................…

…After reviewing the prosecution evidence, the trial court put the appellant on his defence.…

…APPELLANT AND DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS ....................................…

…After reviewing the prosecution evidence, the trial court put the appellant on his defence.…

…APPELLANT AND DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS ....................................…

…After reviewing the prosecution evidence, the trial court put the appellant on his defence.…

…If the prosecution case was accepted there could be no question but that Charles and the second appellant were to be armed with guns when they went to arrest Tenai.…

…In R v Harris (1927) 20 CAR 144, the principal prosecution witness in a prosecution for incest denied at the trial that her father had committed the act alleged.…

…If the prosecution wish to have the accused dealt with for other offences which are not charged, then the accused can be charged with those offences, or, semble in the High Court but not in the subordinate court, the accused…

…Further where the prosecution is in possession of evidence of trafficking (and the evidence is not to be led at the trial ) notice of it should be given to the defence, so that they have an opportunity to consider it and…

…The prosecution offered absolutely no explanation as to why they kept the appellant in custody for that long period and what they had been doing with her.…

…– they ie the prosecution, must prove that the length of the period for which the accused was in their custody had no effect on his making the statement.…

…This was never produced by the prosecution and the only logical observation is that it is because It was adverse to the prosecution case. If it was not, why conceal it from the court.…

…Yes, it was fatal to the prosecution case. It alleged that the appellant received Shs.50/- not 100/- as alleged in the charge or by the prosecution witnesses. She denied the charge.…

…The prosecution contended that the bandits paid the appellant for his services and the payment was in the form of some cattle.…

…On those facts the prosecution contended that the appellant consorted with the robbers.I agree with Mr. Metho, the learned Principal State Counsel, that those facts did not really constitute the charge of consorting.…

…In addition the proceeds of the paraffin giving rise to the prosecution and the lorry that was carrying them were ordered forfeited.…

…With their pleas of not guilty, the prosecution had to prove each and every ingredient of the charge. The defence has no duty to help prove the charge against themselves.…

…That the prosecution failed to produce exhibits that could give clear proof of the commission of the said oence and that the appellant was linked to the same. iv.…

…Shabola submitted that the evidence produced by the prosecution although circumstantial, did place the appellant at the scene of crime. Mr.…

…The grounds of appeal are briefly that the judge erred in confirming the conviction when the RM in his judgment had evaluated the evidence for the prosecution in isolation and failed to consider the unsworn statement, also…

…Thus the judge accepted the prosecution’s case and proceeded to dismiss the appeal. That is worse than commission of the error of looking separately at the case for the prosecution and the case for defence.…

…The case for the prosecution was that the complainant Philomena Wambui (PW 1) was travelling home in a matatu when the appellant snatched her handbag, wrist-watch and Kshs 2,150 cash.…

…The learned trial magistrate found the evidence of PW 1 and PW 2 truthful and found that the prosecution had proved its case to the degree required. He accordingly convicted the appellant as charged.…

…His argument before that Court was that the entire prosecution case against him was dependent on the alleged evidence of identification.…

…Without its consideration and findings made on it, the issue of the appellant’s correct identification remained unresolved, since that defence conflicted with the prosecution case in that connection.…

…The trial Magistrate and the Judge erred in failing to hold that the prosecution had failed to dislodge the appellant’s cross-examination by the prosecution.…

…On the 4th October 1985, shortly before the prosecution put its show on the road, Mr Sereje who appeared for the defence before the trial Magistrate and before us gave the prosecution notice that the appellant’s case was…

…Defence counsel was present from the commencement of the trial up to the close of the prosecution case but was absent on May 22, 1985 when the defence case opened.…

…Again and on his behalf, his counsel who was present throughout the presentation of the prosecution evidence, had cross-examined the prosecution witnesses as he saw it fit.…

…The case for the prosecution was that the accident was caused by the appellant in that he had driven at a high speed as well as on the wrong side of the road and also failed to brake in time to avoid hitting the deceased.…

…The prosecution of the appellant arose from an accident which occurred within Thika Municipality on 11.8.88.…

…The prosecution case against the appellant was that at about 5.30 am on December 11, 1983 he gave a Seiko wrist watch to a waitress named Mary Jane Akinyi Otieno at the Mirangi Day and Night club within the Nakuru District…

…Section 200 is not to be invoked where, as seemingly in the instant case, such a halfheard trial is a short one, it could be conveniently started de novo because the prosecution witnesses are still available locally, and…

…Further the amount of money stolen did not belong to the Government of Kenya and as such the prosecution in the lower courts has failed to establish this fact.…

…The prosecution required to prove that the appellant was the one who played a part in dealing with certain documents to prove that he stole.…

…The prosecution claimed that they had robbed one John Bwana Opundo of cash Kshs 6000. According to the prosecution, the complainant arrived from Bondo with a view to do some shopping in Kisumu. He has a shop there.…

…He held that the prosecution’s version of the matter was the side of truth and that the appellant and his confederates indeed robbed the complainant of his money.…