Search court decisions

…Mr Harwood submitted that this was not applicable to criminal cases, since the State must certainly be able to prosecute on the basis of fraud or mistake. It was the truth behind the document that mattered.…

…In this case however, Gitonga does not allege a criminal fraud upon himself.…

…That the Consent Orders made in the presence and consent of Counsel are binding on all parties to the proceedings and cannot be varied or discharged unless done so by consent or unless they were obtained by fraud or collusion…

…That the orders of 3rd December, 2014 can only be vacated on the making of a formal application by the Respondents and upon proof of mistake, fraud or non-disclosure of material facts by the Applicant. 6.…

…It follows that we nd no merit in the appellant’s persistence in challenging the nding that he was involved in the fraud. 4. It remains, however, to make one clarication.…

…There also must be a knowledge on the appellant’s part of such fraud. From the evidence before the Court and the submission used – the petition of appeal does not question the fakeness of the dollars.…

…From the evidence of PW1 no fraud on the part of the Appellant is shown. PW1further admits Appellant had his permission to use the items while in his employment.…

…It follows that we nd no merit in the appellant’s persistence in challenging the nding that he was involved in the fraud. 4. It remains, however, to make one clarication.…

…It is sad, perhaps, that, under section 143 (1) of the Registered Land Act cap 300 no order can be made to rectify a first registration on the ground of fraud or mistake, but that is irrelevant to the question which we have…

…He stated that the suit properties do not belong to the Petitioner and thus it was trying to obtain court orders by fraud.…

…He stated that the suit properties do not belong to the Petitioner and thus it was trying to obtain court orders by fraud.…

…He stated that the suit properties do not belong to the Petitioner and thus it was trying to obtain court orders by fraud.…

…He stated that the suit properties do not belong to the Petitioner and thus it was trying to obtain court orders by fraud.…