Search court decisions

…APPELLANT AND DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS ....................................…

…After reviewing the prosecution evidence, the trial court put the appellant on his defence.…

…APPELLANT AND DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS ....................................…

…After reviewing the prosecution evidence, the trial court put the appellant on his defence.…

…APPELLANT AND DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS ....................................…

…After reviewing the prosecution evidence, the trial court put the appellant on his defence.…

…APPELLANT AND DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS ....................................…

…After reviewing the prosecution evidence, the trial court put the appellant on his defence.…

…......2ND APPLICANT VERSUS THE DIRECTORATE OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS, KIAMBU....1STRESPONDENT THE NATIONAL POLICE SERVICE............................................................2ND RESPONDENT THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS…

…If the prosecution case was accepted there could be no question but that Charles and the second appellant were to be armed with guns when they went to arrest Tenai.…

…In R v Harris (1927) 20 CAR 144, the principal prosecution witness in a prosecution for incest denied at the trial that her father had committed the act alleged.…

…If the prosecution wish to have the accused dealt with for other offences which are not charged, then the accused can be charged with those offences, or, semble in the High Court but not in the subordinate court, the accused…

…Further where the prosecution is in possession of evidence of trafficking (and the evidence is not to be led at the trial ) notice of it should be given to the defence, so that they have an opportunity to consider it and…

…The prosecution offered absolutely no explanation as to why they kept the appellant in custody for that long period and what they had been doing with her.…

…– they ie the prosecution, must prove that the length of the period for which the accused was in their custody had no effect on his making the statement.…

…This was never produced by the prosecution and the only logical observation is that it is because It was adverse to the prosecution case. If it was not, why conceal it from the court.…

…Yes, it was fatal to the prosecution case. It alleged that the appellant received Shs.50/- not 100/- as alleged in the charge or by the prosecution witnesses. She denied the charge.…

…The Prosecution then proceeded to cross examine the witnessto show that he was unreliable.…

…Anyanzwa, submitted that the prosecution made no attempt to establish any motive for such dastardly offence.…

…The prosecution contended that the bandits paid the appellant for his services and the payment was in the form of some cattle.…

…On those facts the prosecution contended that the appellant consorted with the robbers.I agree with Mr. Metho, the learned Principal State Counsel, that those facts did not really constitute the charge of consorting.…

…In addition the proceeds of the paraffin giving rise to the prosecution and the lorry that was carrying them were ordered forfeited.…

…With their pleas of not guilty, the prosecution had to prove each and every ingredient of the charge. The defence has no duty to help prove the charge against themselves.…

…On that date (February 23, 1982) the respondent appeared before the chief magistrate when prosecution indicated that they intended to consolidate this case with another case.…

…The above section applies where the prosecution have called witnesses to testify against the accused and after the close of the prosecution case. Clearly that was not the position in the present case.…

…That the prosecution failed to produce exhibits that could give clear proof of the commission of the said oence and that the appellant was linked to the same. iv.…

…Shabola submitted that the evidence produced by the prosecution although circumstantial, did place the appellant at the scene of crime. Mr.…

…That the prosecution failed to produce exhibits that could give clear proof of the commission of the said oence and that the appellant was linked to the same. iv.…

…Shabola submitted that the evidence produced by the prosecution although circumstantial, did place the appellant at the scene of crime. Mr.…

…That the prosecution failed to produce exhibits that could give clear proof of the commission of the said oence and that the appellant was linked to the same. iv.…

…Shabola submitted that the evidence produced by the prosecution although circumstantial, did place the appellant at the scene of crime. Mr.…

…The grounds of appeal are briefly that the judge erred in confirming the conviction when the RM in his judgment had evaluated the evidence for the prosecution in isolation and failed to consider the unsworn statement, also…

…Thus the judge accepted the prosecution’s case and proceeded to dismiss the appeal. That is worse than commission of the error of looking separately at the case for the prosecution and the case for defence.…

…The case for the prosecution was that the complainant Philomena Wambui (PW 1) was travelling home in a matatu when the appellant snatched her handbag, wrist-watch and Kshs 2,150 cash.…

…The learned trial magistrate found the evidence of PW 1 and PW 2 truthful and found that the prosecution had proved its case to the degree required. He accordingly convicted the appellant as charged.…

…His argument before that Court was that the entire prosecution case against him was dependent on the alleged evidence of identification.…

…Without its consideration and findings made on it, the issue of the appellant’s correct identification remained unresolved, since that defence conflicted with the prosecution case in that connection.…