Judgment[1989] KEHC 119
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
…The motion first came for a hearing on 25th April, 1989. Mr Mburu appeared for the applicant, while Mr Paul Kiambo appeared for the respondent, the defendant in the action.…
…He was allowed time up to 4th May, 1989, when the application next came for a hearing. He came up with a very recent English case of Rush & Tompkins Ltd v Greater London Council and Another [1988] 3 All ER 737.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
…Originally as the plaint stood, Coast Hauliers were not even a party to the suit and it was only during the course of the hearing that Mr Khanna who appeared for the then sole plaintiff ie Highway carriers Ltd realised that…
…He has not even appeared at the hearing. www.kenyalawreports.or.ke Nevertheless this court does not dispense justice in the abstract. The justice it dispenses must be in accordance with the law.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
…CORPORATION ….RESPONDENT COMBINED WAREHOUSE/ALLIED WHARFAGE….RESPONDENT RULING This is an application for stay of the execution of the Ruling of this court dated the 16th of June, 1995 and the orders made therein pending the hearing…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
…CORPORATION ….RESPONDENT COMBINED WAREHOUSE/ALLIED WHARFAGE….RESPONDENT RULING This is an application for stay of the execution of the Ruling of this court dated the 16th of June, 1995 and the orders made therein pending the hearing…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
…The main application may be relisted for hearing at an early date as there is a Certicate of Urgency. DATED THIS 19TH DAY OF APRIL, 1999. P. N. WAKI JUDGE…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
…When the summons came upon for interpartes hearing the parties’ advocates agreed by consent not to argue the application but left it to this court to make a decision on the basis of the application and affidavits for or against…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
…A bundle of ten photocopies of letters on the settlement were put in by consent at the beginning of the hearing of this suit.…
…The defendant was given about 1½ months notice of the resumption of this hearing but arrived without an advocate. He said he had asked Mr Kupali to represent him and he had expected him to attend but he had not done so.…