Judgment[2005] KEHC 950
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS Civil Suit 1175 of 2005 ADAM THUMI…………………………………………………………….. PLAINTIFF VERSUS MAINA KIRIRO………………………………………...……………… DEFENDANT RULING This Ruling is made in the Chamber Summons application dated 22nd September 2005 brought under Order XXXIX Rules 1, 2 and 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO. 1424 OF 1997 BENROSE FAST FOOD………...……..…………………………………..PLAINTIFF -VERSUSMURANGA PROPERTIES LTD……....….…………………………..DEFENDANT RULING In this application which is by Chamber Summons the applicant is asking for the Orders prayed in the application.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO. 3257 OF 1978 ERIC PETER WANJAU .................................................PLAINTIFF AND GEORGE MUNDET ....................................................DEFENDANT R U L I N G On 26th of March, 1993 this court entered a judgment pursuant to an Award filed and read in court on 2nd December, 1992, in the presence of Mr.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CIVIL SUIT 1293 OF 93 BARNABAS EMBUKHANE & 9 OTHERS.…………PLAINTIFF -VERSUSGENERAL PLASTICS LIMITED.…………………….DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS CIVIL SUIT NO. 1267 OF 1999 DISHON GOGO & 6 OTHERS .............................PLAINTIFF VERSUS BRIGADIER JOHN SEREM & 10 OTHERS ...................DEFENDANTS R U L I N G Before this Court is Amended Chamber Summons brought under Order XXI Rule 22.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS CIVIL SUIT NO. 2234 OF 1993 IDRIS KIBIRANGA ........................................................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
rule 5, make provision for the same remedy he did not think there was any conflict. The two orders merely provide different grounds for the remedy, he said.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
would have been done on October 24, 1990 a day after the hearing and making of garnishee order absolute. That notification would have served no purpose on that date for no fault of the Garnishee who was not served as provided by Rule 1 (2) of the said order.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
thereafter proceed to hearing de novo. This order has not been yet complied with and the consent order (which gives no time limit) is still there if the parties wish to give effect thereto.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO 2461 OF 1992 GITHUNGURI & ANOTHER T/A GITHUNGURI & COLLINS ARCHITECTS …….……..APPLICANT VERSUS KENYA RAILWAYS CORPORATION….…………… DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS Civil Suit 3512 of 1990 PRUDENTIAL FINANCE LIMITED........................... PLAINTIFF VERSUS JOHNSON NGANGA MBUGUA............................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO 2604 OF 1988 DAVID MUOLA …………………………………….....…… PLAINTIFF VERSUS EAST AFRICAN PACKAGING LIMITED …….….........RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO 2552 OF 1987 JAMES MUTULU OKUNNE ………………………………… PLAINTIFF VERSUS NZOIA SUGAR COMPANY LTD & ANOTHER….............DEFENDANTS
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO 3086 OF 1989 ROBERT LETAPIN OLE KIDOTU...........................PLAINTIFF VERSUS STEPHEN MUIRURI...........................................RESPONDENT RULING The objector herein, Loise Njoki Murathi seeks release of a motor vehicle, KZZ 658 attached at the instance of the plaintiff herein, Mr Kidotu for a debt owed by the defendant Mr Muiruri who is the husband of the objector. The application is supported by an affidavit swo
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) CIVIL SUIT 4147 OF 1986 PETER MUATHE NGUVI ………………………..PLAINTIFF versus MASINYA MUTUA………...……….……………DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO 2836 OF 1990 TRICOR ENTERPRISES LTD & 2 OTHERS..…………APPLICANTS VERSUS ANNE NYAWACHA MWOK-HANDA ………….….. RESPONDENTS RULING A short history of the matter: On the 11th June, 1990, the plaintiff/ applicants filed a plaint in the registry of the court.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
property ie Nairobi (Block 106 /242 (House No 203) until the determination of this suit or further orders of this court. Costs of this application to be costs in the cause.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO 4925 OF 1988 ELIUD OKIRING FREDRICK EPOLOTO ZAKAYO EPUS ……………………………….....….. APPLICANTS VERSUS ISAAC NAMANGO J S KIAKULA ………………….…………………..RESPONDENTS RULING The plaintiffs are practicing priests under the Diocese of Nambale in the Church of the Province of Kenya (hereinafter called CPK).
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO 1795 OF 1987 PAN AFRICAN CREDIT & FINANCE LTD...........PLAINTIFF VERSUS FRICMILLS INTERNATIONAL LTD.................DEFENDANT RULING January 11, 1989 Pall J delivered the following Ruling. The plaintiff has filed this application for a summary judgment against the defendant in respect of the plaintiff’s claim in the plaint for Kshs 1,795,595.85 together with interest thereon at 19% and costs.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO 665 OF 1988 B M MWANZA …………………..…… PLAINTIFF VERSUS JOHNSTONE MAKAU……………… DEFENDANT RULING The plaintiff who is a quantity surveyor has filed this suit to recover his professional fees from the defendant. The defendant by his defence has disputed the plaintiff’s claim.