Search court decisions

…The House of Lords held that without prejudice correspondence exchanged with the object of effecting a compromise in the action was privileged.…

…It was his submission that the principal question in the case was whether the without prejudice correspondence were discoverable in a civil suit.…

…Upon considering the record and counsel’s submissions, we ask ourselves whether any prejudice had resulted to the appellant by his counsel’s absence at the stage of the proceedings when it occurred.…

…The appellant could not have suffered any prejudice during the presentation of the prosecution case and in his own defence he said nothing in court to incriminate himself.…

…Whilst the High Court offered its protection in general to accused persons charged with conspiracy, it dismissed the appeal, because no prejudice would be caused in this particular case.…

…It is admitted that there is no illegality in such a joinder, but we agree that it ought not to be done in cases where it is likely to prejudice the conduct of the defence.…

…So on any view of the matter the defendants intended conduct cannot in law prejudice the Plaintiff’s legal right, if any.…

…If it is borne in mind that in interlocutory injunction is granted in order that the risk of a serious prejudice to the Applicant’s legal rights between the time of the application and the time of trial may be forestalled…

…the authorities as they now stand Republic v Mongella s/o Ngui (1934) 1 EACE 152, Ngidipe Bui Kapriram & Another v R. (1939) 6 EACA 118 and AttorneyGeneral v Onyango Oludhe & Another, (1954) 21 EACE 238 – the question of prejudice…

…grounds of appeal that the learned Judge erred in law: in failing to find that the conviction of the appellant by the trial court had introduced and took into account matters that were never canvassed in evidence to the prejudice…

…Kebira relied on his written submissions to the effect that the learned Judge failed to find that the trial Court took into account matters that were never canvassed in evidence to the prejudice of the appellant; that the…

…It cannot be easily argued that the trial did not therefore embarrass and or prejudice the appellant.…

…This means that the same will not have been obtained from the accused either by fear of prejudice or hope of advantage exercised or held out by a person in authority.…

…The plaintiff in making that objection failed to state what prejudice he suffered as a result of failure of 3rd defendant to so particularize.…

…Secondly, the evidence of the 1st witness, Wilson Ndeda, appears to have no relation to the offence with which the appellants are charged save to prejudice the mind of the court.…

…The application was premised on ground that the appeal had a high chance of success and further that the appeal may take long to be determined which would prejudice the applicant.…

…The application was premised on ground that the appeal had a high chance of success and further that the appeal may take long to be determined which would prejudice the applicant.…

…The court cannot however continue to protect a party which has taken no steps to help itself, particularly when its inaction is occasioning prejudice to the other side.…

…Her failure to consider in her judgment the fact that the appellant had refunded the money, he allegedly unlawfully obtained long before the case came for a hearing did not in our view cause any prejudice to the appellant…

…However, the prejudice may have been cured when the witnesses addressed the issue of overloading. I say “may” because even the issue of overloading was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.…

…There would be no prejudice in substituting an alternate verdict under section 308(2) of the Penal Code on this ground. The appellant however has taken the prosecution witnesses to task.…

…time when the trial first commenced and another magistrate taking over almost midway, is so short so as not to cause or produce any accountable loss of memory on their part, whether actual, presumed or pretended, to the prejudice…

…Besides it has not caused any prejudice to the Applicants which cannot be compensatable with an award of costs.…

…It was not such as to prejudice the appellant except a court should always make a finding according to the evidence to avoid semantics which can also make different meanings.…

…I am satisfied therefore that no prejudice of any sort was caused to the appellants by reason of the poorly drafted charge.…