Judgment[1989] KEHC 4
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…The evidence of the 2nd Defendant before the Arbitrator contradicts his own evidence in court that he had never been to that land till after the land was transferred to him.…
…His evidence and that of the 1st Defendant that they visited the said land in September, 1987, clearly confirms the evidence of the Plaintiff and his witnesses that both Defendants had come to the said land in September,…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…Given the fact that sometimes different people may bear the same or similar names or names with very small or insignificant differences, one requires positive evidence to show that the two of the six respondents in the former…
…In his judgment delivered on September 10, 1985, Mr Justice Joseph Butler – Sloss, went through the evidence and found that as at the time of filing the originating summons in 1979, the applicant had not been in possession…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…The defendant in his evidence admitted that the plaintiff is the son of his deceased brother, Nkambi.…
…The defendant has a younger brother, Mbae Nkambi but from the evidence adduced, it is not certain whether he was born before his father’s death or after his father had died.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…You look at the laws of Kenya and you find no discrimination against children’s evidence on mere grounds of the children being young.…
…Subject to the rules of corroboration in certain circumstances, and corroboration may also apply to the evidence of certain adults, there is no difference in evaluating the evidence of the old and of the young.…