Search court decisions

…I would assess her permanent disability to between 10 – 15%” Then on December 15, 1983 Professor Ruberti saw the plaintiff again and this is what he (Professor Ruberti) says in his report dated December 22, 1983: “An EEG…

…Obviously this patient has become a post-traumatic epileptic and therefore her permanent disability should be reassessed now between twenty five to thirty percent.…

…In this case the disability was not included by the doctor. In a summary:- I hereby enter judgement of the plaintiff on 100% liability against the defendants.…

…The plaintiff was examined by 2 doctors, and a report is on the record, with a conclusion that no neurological permanent disability was detected, but a reduction of his sight field on the left eye was detected.…

…But, with respect, the underlying principle is the same: an infant is still under a similar disability to enter into a valid agreement.…

…Secondly the claimant must not have been under any disability affecting the prescriptive period. Hosea -vNjiru and Others [1974] EA 526.…