Judgment[2008] KEHC 756
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Civil Case 2772 of 1997 ALLAN S. REYNOLDS .................................................PLAINTIFF V E R S U S TWIGA CHEMICALS INDUSTRIES LTD...............DEFENDANT R U L I N G On 3rd October, 2008 the court (Waweru, J) conditionally allowed an application herein for stay of execution of decree pending appeal.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Civil Case 862 of 2004 ALBERT KIRUTHI MUKABI (T/a PIPELINE HARDWARE)...PLAINTIFF V E R S U S CITY COUNCIL OF NAIROBI ..............................................DEFENDANT R U L I N G It is conceded by the Plaintiff’s learned counsel that this suit can no longer be maintained. This is because of the expiry of the Plaintiff’s trading licence on or about the 31st December, 2004 upon which the suit was based.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPULBIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1269 OF 2000 FRANCIS MUKUNGA WAWERU……………………………..PLAINTIFF VERSUS ATTORNEY GENERAL………………………………………DEFENDANT RULING There was a preliminary point raised by Mr.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 820 OF 2003 ALI AND 3 OTHERS ……………..…. PLAINTIFFS VERSUS CITY COUNCIL OF NAIROBI……….
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 2495 OF 1997 JANE KANYI KAHARA………………………….……..……..PLAINTIFF V E R S U S THE ATTORNEY GENERAL……………………………….DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 538 OF 2002 ABDUL GAFFOR…………………………………..PLAINTIFF VERSUS JAVID IQBAL MALIK…..………………………..DEFENDANT RULING By this application filed on 3rd October, 2002, the plaintiff who had earlier filed suit for taking accounts and profits due after taking accounts now seeks to have the defendants defence filed in that suit denying existence of any agreement between the parties by which he had allegedly borrowed shs 3,000,000/= towards
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
plus interest, and costs of this suit and interest thereon also at the usual respective rates.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
plus interest, and costs of this suit and interest thereon also at the usual respective rates.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 598 OF 1993 CLEMENT ODONGO AWANGE ………………….......
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1488 OF 1998 HANNAH MUMBI KOMO………………………………………..……….PLAINTIFF -VERSUSLEONARD NJOGU NJAU T/A KINYANJUI & NJAU ADVOCATES…………………………………….DEFENDANTS
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1488 OF 1998 HANNAH MUMBI KOMO………………………………………..……….PLAINTIFF -VERSUSLEONARD NJOGU NJAU T/A KINYANJUI & NJAU ADVOCATES…………………………………….DEFENDANTS
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE 2117 OF 1995 SAMMY MAINA GACHIRU ............................... PLAINTIFF VERSUS MAINA KARUMBA & 2 OTHERS .................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO.1042 OF 1996 CANNON ASSURANCE (KENYA) LTD …………….…. PLAINTFF VERSUS SILVESTER KURIA KINYANJUI & ANOTHER…..
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO.2440 OF 1999 CHRISPHINE MAINA GATURU ………………………………… PLAINTIFF VERSUS MUYA MACHARIA ……………………………………………… DEFENDANT R U L I N G This is an application for summary judgment on the grounds that the defence discloses no reasonable defence that it is a sham and intended to delay the Plaintiff’s claim. The Plaintiff claims to be the registered owner of the suit land.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
Summary judgement Order 35 r 1 CPR Order 6 r13(b) (c) & (d) Order 12 r 6 CPR REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS CIVIL CASE NO. 1232 OF 1998 CORPORATE INSURANCE CO.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 3428 OF 1994 JOHN KARANJA GACHINA...........................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS WANGARI KONGU.......................................................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Civil Case 933 of 1996 CONTINENTAL DEVELOPERS LTD............................................................. PLAINTIFF VERSUS SAUTI HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD................................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS Civil Case 5189 of 1991 JOSEPH NJUGUNA............................................ …………….PLAINTIFF VERSUS CYRUS NJATHI....................................................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS CIVIL CASE NO. 1720 OF 1995 ROSE WAMBUI KIBUI & ANO .....................................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
In absence of any indication my brother was correct in proceeding with he trial on 20.3.96 under order 9b CPR. From the evidence before the court the plaintiff stated that he boarded the defendants lorry.