Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…He claims general damages for this loss of time, For his time and effort spent on the re-negotiation of the loan facility with the lender, arising from the non-utilization of the offered loan facility within the specified…
…Kshs.200,000/= (b) loss of interest on rents ………………….Kshs. 30,000/= (c) loss of time on re-negotiation of the loan facility ……………………………Kshs. 35,000/= (d) loss of interest on the depositof Kshs.575,000/= and on legal fees…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…He claims general damages for this loss of time, For his time and effort spent on the re-negotiation of the loan facility with the lender, arising from the non-utilization of the offered loan facility within the specified…
…Kshs.200,000/= (b) loss of interest on rents ………………….Kshs. 30,000/= (c) loss of time on re-negotiation of the loan facility ……………………………Kshs. 35,000/= (d) loss of interest on the depositof Kshs.575,000/= and on legal fees…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…Wamalwa, counsel for the applicant herein, in which he referred to negotiation which commenced in this matter by and between the parties after consent order had been recorded and interpreted by honourable Mr Justice Hayanga…
…Parties entered into negotiations and the firm of Wambugu & Company Advocates released a sum of Kshs 7,543,467.65 in terms of the professional undertaking given by the said advocates.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…Wamalwa, counsel for the applicant herein, in which he referred to negotiation which commenced in this matter by and between the parties after consent order had been recorded and interpreted by honourable Mr Justice Hayanga…
…Parties entered into negotiations and the firm of Wambugu & Company Advocates released a sum of Kshs 7,543,467.65 in terms of the professional undertaking given by the said advocates.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…It is clear, from the second paragraph of that letter, that the plaintiff was making no claim to have paid dowry but was suggesting merely that there might be some discussion or negotiation about it.…