Judgment[2008] KEHC 756
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…of deposit of the decretal sum.…
…In the present case, because of the requirement to renew a bank guarantee every year, I did not consider that a bank guarantee for the decretal sum was the appropriate security. I still hold that view.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…Kshs.100,000/= Special damages - Kshs.34,457/= Lost years - Kshs.2,600,000/= Total - Kshs.2,834,457/= Less 20% contribution - Kshs.566,892/= - Kshs.2,267,565/= The plaintiff shall further have costs and interest on the decretal…
…sum from the date of this judgment.Orders accordingly.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…As most facts are in dispute, it is sufficient at this stage to state that the Plaint discloses that the sum claimed by each is the decretal sum paid by each plaintiff to First National Bank of Chicago (the bank) pursuant…
…No. 1428 of 1982 and subsequent payment of the decretal sum by the plaintiffs to the bank. Doc. No. 73: Decree given on 14.6.84 and issued on 30.4.85. Doc.…