Judgment[1992] KEHC 142
Habib Bank Ltd v Mohamed Shariff Hassan
High Court at Mombasa
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 368 OF 1992 HABIB BANK LIMITED..........................PLAINTIFF VERSUS MOHAMED SHARIFF HASSAN..........DEFENDANT RULING In the suit (as pleaded in the plaint) the plaintiff claims from the defendant a sum of Shs 760,322/65 alleged to be the debit balance of the amount due and owing by the defendant to the plaintiff as at 16th April, 1992. This is alleged to be in respect of the bank loan or an overdraft reflected on the defe
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 182 OF 1991 NGANGA GICHURI .............................................1ST PLAINTIFF DAVID KIHANYA NGANGA ................................2ND PLAINTIFF VERSUS NDUNGU NGANGA..................................................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 4988 OF 1992 DP & OTHERS...........................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS KENYA TIMES MEDIA TRUST LTD.......................DEFENDANT RULING The plaintiffs have brought this suit against the defendants for libel. The plaintiffs obtained a temporary exparte injunction restraining the defendant, one of the national dailies, from repeating the publication of the alleged defamatory matter or of similar
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 649 OF 1991 AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION...........................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS CONTAINER FREIGHTERS CO LTD................................RESPONDENT RULING This application for summary judgment is brought by way of a notice of motion under order 35 rules 1, 2 and 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules. It seeks an order that summary judgment be entered for the plaintiff, Agricultural Development Corporat
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Dola v Attorney General High Court, at Mombasa August 27, 1992 Omolo J Civil Case No. 327 of 1989 August 27, 1992, Omolo J delivered the following Judgment.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 581 OF 1988 HECO UBERSEEHANDEL.......................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS MAC’S PHARMACEUTICALS LTD ....................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 3102 OF 1988 WATSON MOGERE .............................................PLAINTIFF BENJAMIN OMWANWA.......................................PLAINTIFF FRANCIS KIBORE................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS EAST AFRICAN BUILDING SOCIETY...............DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Jefa v Kenya Ports Authority High Court, at Mombasa June 9, 1992 Omolo J Civil Case No. 721 of 1988 June 9, 1992,Omolo J delivered the following Judgment.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
will decree costs in favour of the defendant. In those circumstances, is there really any basis for an order for security of costs?
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET CIVIL CASE NO 61 OF 1991 GABRIEL NDUNGU KINUTHIA.........................APPLICANT VERSUS GEORGE W WAWERU................................RESPONDENT RULING On 27th December 1991, the plaintiff/applicant filed a suit against the defendant/respondent and claimed from him both general and special damages arising out of an accident which occurred on 16th June 1989 along Nyeri-Nyahururu Road in which the plaintiff/applicant sustained severe injur
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 359 OF 1991 MARTHA WANGARI NJOKA...................PLAINTIFF VERSUS NAIROBI CITY COMMISSION................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Kinji Ltd & Another v Kogo & Another High Court, at Mombasa March 31, 1992 Omolo J Civil Case No. 938 of 1991 March 31, 1992, Omolo J delivered the following Ruling.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
will decree costs in favour of the defendant. In those circumstances, is there really any basis for an order for security of costs?
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 2317 OF 1980 MAXILLAN JOHN KISAKA.............................PLAINTIFF VERSUS BONDO TRANSPORTERS .......................DEFENDANT DALAS NDEGE............................................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Losiamuro v Lochab Brothers & another High Court, at Mombasa December 30, 1991 Wambilyangah J Civil Case No 48 of 1988
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
Wamalwa & Company Advocates were not able to meet those requirements. They had to get the Order varied so that they can use another Bank.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
N Wasike v Destimo Wamboko (1982-1988) KAR 625 where it was said that a consent judgment or order has the contractual effect and can only be set aside on those grounds which would justify the setting of a contract. Those grounds are such as fraud, mistake or misrepresentation.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Provincial Construction Company Ltd & another v Attorney General High Court, at Nairobi October 15, 1991 Mbito J Civil Case No 165 of 1991
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
Court for want of prosecution be set aside. The learned judge while setting aside the dismissal order declined an application for leave to appeal without assigning any reasons.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Njoroge v Prestige Air Services Ltd High Court, at Mombasa August 15, 1991 Wambilyangah J Civil Case No 204 of 1990 Civil Practice and Procedure – setting aside - default judgment – judgment in default of defence – discretion to set aside such judgment – principles on which this discretion is exercised – where delay in filing defence was out of the defendant’s advocate’s mistake – whether justice required that default judgment be set aside in such a case. The plaintiff applied