Judgment[2001] KEHC 637
DEPOSIT PROTECTION BOARD v PANACHAD JIVRAJ SHAH,DIPAK PANACHAD & MRS. DIPAK SHAH
High Court at Nairobi
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS CIVIL CASE NO. 1529 OF 2001 DEPOSIT PROTECTION BOARD (Suing as the Liquidator of Reliance Bank Ltd.) ……...
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS CIVIL CASE NO.102 OF 1997 INTERLAND DISTRIBUTORS LTD:::::::::::::::::::::::PLAINTIFF VERSUS P. & JOSEPH MULATYA KIMANI::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: DEFENDANT Coram: R.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS CIVIL CASE NO. 490 OF 2001 IRON AFRICA LIMITED …………………………………….
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 598 OF 1993 CLEMENT ODONGO AWANGE ………………….......
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1488 OF 1998 HANNAH MUMBI KOMO………………………………………..……….PLAINTIFF -VERSUSLEONARD NJOGU NJAU T/A KINYANJUI & NJAU ADVOCATES…………………………………….DEFENDANTS
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1488 OF 1998 HANNAH MUMBI KOMO………………………………………..……….PLAINTIFF -VERSUSLEONARD NJOGU NJAU T/A KINYANJUI & NJAU ADVOCATES…………………………………….DEFENDANTS
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE 2117 OF 1995 SAMMY MAINA GACHIRU ............................... PLAINTIFF VERSUS MAINA KARUMBA & 2 OTHERS .................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO.1042 OF 1996 CANNON ASSURANCE (KENYA) LTD …………….…. PLAINTFF VERSUS SILVESTER KURIA KINYANJUI & ANOTHER…..
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
has been put forward by the applicant to justify the grant of the orders sought. It is observed that the order sought is the setting aside of a default judgment entered herein.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
High Court Of Kenya At Nairobi Milimani Commercial Courts Civil Case No 535 Of 2000 Delons Limited versus Express Diaries Limited
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO.2440 OF 1999 CHRISPHINE MAINA GATURU ………………………………… PLAINTIFF VERSUS MUYA MACHARIA ……………………………………………… DEFENDANT R U L I N G This is an application for summary judgment on the grounds that the defence discloses no reasonable defence that it is a sham and intended to delay the Plaintiff’s claim. The Plaintiff claims to be the registered owner of the suit land.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET Civil Case 10 of 1980 FRANCIS ORIGO...............................................1st PLAINTIFF PETER PANYAKO...........................................2nd PLAINTIFF VERSUS JACOB KUMALI MUNGALA............................... DEFENDANT RULING On 12th May, 2000 the Resident Judge Eldoret, Lady Justice Nambuye wrote to me thus on the above case: - "There is an application for Review pending in theabove file.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
Draw a notice of penal consequences. The process server has to ensure there is personal service.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA John Njoroge Warui vUniversal Bank Ltd High Court of Kenya at Nairobi August 7, 2000 Milimani Commercial Courts T Mbaluto, Judge Civil Case No 583 of 2000 This is an application for an injunction under Order 39 rule 1, 2 and 3 and to restrain the defendant from repossessing or taking possession of motor vehicle registration number KAC 031J until the suit filed by the plaintiff/applicant against the defendant/respondent is heard and determined. The application is supported by
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
Summary judgement Order 35 r 1 CPR Order 6 r13(b) (c) & (d) Order 12 r 6 CPR REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS CIVIL CASE NO. 1232 OF 1998 CORPORATE INSURANCE CO.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA 1 Barry Scutt & Another v Hitesh Jethwa & 2 Others High Court of Kenya at Nairobi June 29, 2000 Milimani Commercial Courts T Mbaluto, Judge Civil Case No 937 of 2000 June 29, 2000 T Mbaluto, Judge delivered the following ruling. This ruling relates to the issue as to who between the applicants who are the plaintiffs in this suit and the 3rd defendant/respondent should bear the costs of the application filed by the plaintiffs herein.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS Civil Case 108 of 1997 MOSES MWANGI MUCHINA …………….……………......….. AFRICAN LINE TRANSPORT CO.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1759 OF 1999 DAVIS NATHAN CHELOGOI..................................................PLAINTIFF versus DIAMOND TRUST BANK LTD............................................DEFENDANT R U L I N G On 11th November, 1999 I gave an order of Injunction to restrain the defendant herein from selling alienating or disposing of by public auction or private treaty or in any other way parting with title for property known as L.R.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET Civil Case 73 of 1995 1. DENNIS MUYA GACHANJA (minor suing through next friend)...........PLAINTIFFS versus 1.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 3428 OF 1994 JOHN KARANJA GACHINA...........................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS WANGARI KONGU.......................................................DEFENDANT