Search court decisions

…Before the commencement of the hearing of this suit, the parties produced before us, by consent, the Deed as exhibit 1, a bundle of correspondence as exhibit 2 and yet another bundle of correspondence with the Chief Kadhi…

…The hearing proceeded ex parte because neither the defendants nor their advocates appeared. Nor was there any explanation as to their nonattendance.…

…He, therefore, went to see a dentist on the morning of the hearing date with the result that he was not able to attend. That ground was given much later after this application had been filed.…

…High Court, Nairobi under order 39 rule 1 and 2 of the rules seeking orders that the defendants and each of them be restrained by injunction from removing the body of the deceased from the Nairobi City Mortuary pending the hearing…

…The defendants thereafter hurried to this court and successfully sought the injunction and order granted on January 7, 1987 pending the hearing of the interlocutory appeal.…

…335 OF 1997 N W...........................................................APPLICANT versus M M.........................................................RESPONDENT R U L I N G There is a Divorce petition still pending for hearing…

…Be that as it may, the application that came before the learned trial magistrate was interlocutory pending the hearing of the divorce petition. Its foundation was the petition which was the substantive suit.…

…restraining the defendants whether by themselves individually or collectively or by their servants or agents from selling and transferring any of their shares in a company known as Umoja Enterprises Limited pending the hearing…

…Applying these principles to the present application and upon a full examination of the pleadings, the affidavits filed in support and in opposition and the annexures thereto and after hearing the viva voce testimony of the…

…The appellant through his advocate in opposing the application has deposed that the delay in setting the appeal down for hearing has been occasioned by the failure of the court to avail the proceedings of the trial court…

…In the first situation, if within 3 months after the giving of directions the appeal has not been set down for hearing by the appellant, the respondent may elect either to set it down for hearing himself or apply for its…

….…...RESPONDENT RULING The Notice of Motion application which came for hearing was filed in court on 23rd March 1988. Exparte orders had been granted to the applicant on 7/3/88.…

…It was the inter-parte hearing which came before me.…

…RESPONDENT RULING This is an application for stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of an intended appeal. It is made under O XLI rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules.…

…She adjourned the application to 26th April 1994 for hearing inter partes.…

…From the directions of the Honourable Chief Justice what is for hearing today is the main suit and not the application. I am prepared for hearing of the main suit.…

…Onyango is recorded to have stated as follows: “This hearing date was taken by consent of the parties. This morning I saw the Plaintiff in court.…

…It would appear to us that in this case the application was placed before Hayanga, J. for hearing on that account.…

…Alternatively, it seems, for it is not entirely clear, Mr Khanna, moves for an order that the executors of the deceased be substituted now and the hearing of the appeal be deferred pending the production of their grant of…

…probate, or the substitution and the hearing be deferred until the executors have obtained grant of probate.…

…, which in my view can have no other meaning than a reference to the hearing of the petition and not, for instance, to the hearing of an application such as that with which we are concerned in the present case.…

…The consequence of a breach of the rule is that the hearing of the petition is cancelled.…

…COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 772 OF 1984 AURORA BAKING COMPANY (1975) LTD………………PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT AND PHENNTHA WANINGI AND 3 OTHERS………….DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS RULING By an order of this court dated 19.11.84 the hearing…

…should have gone to the Deputy Registrar of this court in regard to the plaintiff/applicant’s application file din this court on 13.11.84 when by the order of this court dated 19.11.84 the said application was coming up for hearing…

….…..PLAINTIFF VERSUS LIMURU PYRETHRUM GROWERS CO-OP LTD & 9 OTHERS…… DEFENDANTS RULING At the opening of the hearing inter partes of an application by the plaintiffs for an injunction, the counsel for the defendants took…

…The order sought having been granted on the ex parte application a hearing inter partes of the same was fixed for 4th May 1989 when the preliminary objection was taken as stated above.…

….…..RESPONDENT RULING When this appeal was called on for hearing, Mr Kwach, appearing on behalf of the two respondents, took the preliminary objection that the mandatory provisions of Rule 85 (1) (f) of rules of this court…

….…..RESPONDENT RULING When this appeal was called on for hearing, Mr Kwach, appearing on behalf of the two respondents, took the preliminary objection that the mandatory provisions of Rule 85 (1) (f) of rules of this court…

…was fixed for hearing on March 29, 1979.…

…It does not appear that the advocate informed his client of the hearing date.…

…Following interpartes hearing of that injunction application interlocutory injunction was issued on 17th September 2003 pending the determination of this suit.…

…Once that injunction was granted the plaintiff took no action either in undertaking discovery or in setting down the suit for hearing.…

…The suit came for hearing on three different occasions, thereafter, but was on each occasion adjourned for one reason or another.…

…It was called and was listed to come for hearing on 9th and 10th May, 1989. On 9th May 1989 the suit was called.…