JudgmentVIOLET JUMBA OKINDA VS NATIONAL COUNCIL OF NON -GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS AND KEVINNAH LOYATUM
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: High Court Civil Appellate DivisionCivil Appeal
…The report made a reference to the appellant, informing the committee about her removal from office, over an account she had opened, in the name of the 1st respondent, without knowledge and approval of the Board, which led…
Division and case type: High Court Civil Appellate DivisionCivil Appeal
…The report made a reference to the appellant, informing the committee about her removal from office, over an account she had opened, in the name of the 1st respondent, without knowledge and approval of the Board, which led…
Division and case type: High Court DivCivil Appeal
…The Petitioners contend that the said decision was erroneous in law, constitutionally infirm, and has precipitated imminent actions including their degazettment and removal from office.” 10.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…I would say no, because the phrase can only apply to what can be lawfully done and the removal from office by a vote of no confidence has, as the circular of 6th July, 1993, pointed out, no legal basis under the Act.…