Search court decisions

…--[endif]-->This is an interlocutory appeal from the ruling and order of the Subordinate Court allowing the Respondent’s application to recall the plaintiff for further examination in chief and cross-examination for the purpose…

…The court has broad discretion to permit the recalling of parties for examination and cross-examination.…

…--[endif]-->This is an interlocutory appeal from the ruling and order of the Subordinate Court allowing the Respondent’s application to recall the plaintiff for further examination in chief and cross-examination for the purpose…

…The court has broad discretion to permit the recalling of parties for examination and cross-examination.…

…The respondent breathed life to his statement, and was confronted on its contents, by being tested on cross-examination.…

…The 1st appellant shied from doing the same, instead his statement was produced as an exhibit, and was not tested on cross-examination.…

…In cross-examination, he testified that he was not the investigating officer. That the accident occurred at 9pm that it was dark as there were no street lights.…

…In cross-examination, he testified that he saw the respondent 3 months after the accident and that with the right treatment it would take 6 months for the respondent to heal.…

…Its appearance and participation is limited to cross-examination of the witness and nothing more.…

…The order dated 29.10.2021 is however set aside to the extent that it permits the Respondent, “to participate fully in the trial and/or formal proof process/proceedings including cross-examination of the Plaintiff’s witnesses…

…On cross examination by the advocates for the 1 st Respondent, he stated that the information on 21 houses was from the minister for housing.…

…On cross examination, he stated that he watched the entire tape of the conference. The minister indicated that a legal officer was allocated 21 houses.…

…Its appearance and participation is limited to cross-examination of the witness and nothing more.…

…The order dated 21.101.2021 is however set aside to the extent that it permits the Respondent, “to participate fully in the trial and/or formal proof process/proceedings including cross-examination of the Plaintiff’s witnesses…

…On cross examination he told court that they had insured motor vehicle KAN 105J. He told court that the First Insurance paid Kshs.130,651/- for repairs.…

…On cross examination he told court that the Matatu used the wrong lane to overtake. DW1 Mr.…

…On cross examination he told court that they had insured motor vehicle KAN 105J. He told court that the First Insurance paid Kshs.130,651/- for repairs.…

…On cross examination he told court that the Matatu used the wrong lane to overtake. DW1 Mr.…

…That evidence was not shaken during cross-examination (At pages 65 and 66 of the Record of Appeal). 26.…

…DWI testimony was inconsistent and the witness made an admission to giving false testimony during cross examination by third party.…

…The witness added in cross examination that, the report indicated that the accident was on 20-12-2022 although the treatment notes indicated 5-02-2022 as the date of the accident.…

…When he was put to cross-examination, he stated that the victim took time to heal before he reported the accident.…

…Under cross-examination, the witness admitted that she did not produce a marriage certificate to prove her legal marriage to the Deceased.…

…Under cross-examination, the witness conceded that the employment contract she produced was addressed to a person named "Lawrence Omondi".…

…On cross-examination, Pw1 testified that she did not visit the scene to ascertain whether there was a zebra crossing and that no one was charged.…

…He testified on cross-examination, he testified that he got to know of Pw1’s earnings from her colleagues.…

…Under cross-examination by Counsel for the 2nd Respondent, he agreed that the treatment notes do not indicate a fracture.…

…Under cross-examination by Counsel for the Appellant, she stated that the 1st Respondent was not admitted at the hospital.…

…In cross-examination, he reiterated that he was not the investigating officer and as such did not visit the scene.…

…In cross-examination, she stated that the exhibit she had produced as DExh1 was from Kondele Police Station.…

…Under cross-examination by Counsel for the 2nd Respondent, he agreed that the treatment notes do not indicate a fracture.…

…Under cross-examination by Counsel for the Appellant, she stated that the 1st Respondent was not admitted at the hospital.…

…In cross-examination, he reiterated his testimony and stated that the motorbike was damaged from behind. That it was early in the morning and there was a bit of light.…

…In cross-examination, he told the court that he was approaching the motorcycle from behind and that there was no vehicle between him and the motorbike.…

…On cross-examination, it was his case that the minor understood traffic rules and that the 2 nd appellant catered for the medical expenses.…

…On cross-examination, he stated that the minor was walking beside him when the accident occurred, and that he narrowly avoided being hit by the same motor vehicle.…

…In cross-examination, he denied that the deceased was attempting to board the bus which was in motion. 9.…

…In cross-examination, he stated that he saw the deceased jump into the vehicle using the side mirror. 10.…