Judgment[2002] KECA 310
Abraham Tenoi Kimala v Job Kipsang Suter
Court of Appeal at Nakuru
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU (CORAM: OMOLO, TUNOI & O’KUBASU JJ A ) CIVIL APPLICATION NO 51 OF 2001 BETWEEN ABRAHAM TENOI KIMALA................................APPLICANT AND JOB KIPSANG SUTER ......................................RESPONDENT RULING OF THE COURT This is a reference from the ruling of a learned single judge of this Court delivered on 25th September, 2001, whereby, in exercise of his powers under rule 4 of our rules, he refused to grant the applicant extension of time within
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU CORAM: KEIWUA, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPEAL (APPLICATION) NO.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: AKIWUMI, TUNOI & O'KUBASU, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 212 OF 1996 BEATRICE NYAMBURA MUCHERU ...........................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET Civil Case 10 of 1980 FRANCIS ORIGO...............................................1st PLAINTIFF PETER PANYAKO...........................................2nd PLAINTIFF VERSUS JACOB KUMALI MUNGALA............................... DEFENDANT RULING On 12th May, 2000 the Resident Judge Eldoret, Lady Justice Nambuye wrote to me thus on the above case: - "There is an application for Review pending in theabove file.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPEAL 249 OF 1999 MINT HOLDINGS LTD.....…………...…....................1ST APPELLANT SAMSON N. KEENGU......………………..................2ND APPELLANT AND TRUST BANK LTD................................…………….....RESPONDENT (Appeal from the Ruling and orders of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Hon.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM:LAKHA J.A (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI 115 OF 2000 BETWEEN KAPLAN & STRATTON………………...........................……………APPLICANT AND L.Z.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI Civil Appeal 162 of 1999 ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF MAXWELL MAURICE OMBOGO (DECEASED) .........................................................APPELLANT AND STANDARD CHARTERED BANK KENYA LTD........1ST RESPONDENT LAW SOCIETY OF KENYA........................................ 2ND RESPONDENT (Appeal from the Ruling and Order of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi - Mr Justice A.I.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI Civil Appeal 162 of 1999 ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF MAXWELL MAURICE OMBOGO (DECEASED) .........................................................APPELLANT AND STANDARD CHARTERED BANK KENYA LTD........1ST RESPONDENT LAW SOCIETY OF KENYA........................................ 2ND RESPONDENT (Appeal from the Ruling and Order of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi - Mr Justice A.I.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI Civil Appeal 162 of 1999 ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF MAXWELL MAURICE OMBOGO (DECEASED) .........................................................APPELLANT AND STANDARD CHARTERED BANK KENYA LTD........1ST RESPONDENT LAW SOCIETY OF KENYA........................................ 2ND RESPONDENT (Appeal from the Ruling and Order of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi - Mr Justice A.I.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Gicheru, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPEAL 10 OF 1999 LAWI KIPLAGAT ………….……………………………………… APPELLANT AND DELPHIS BANK LIMITED ……………….……………………. RESPONDENT (An appeal from the ruling of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Kuloba, J.) dated 3rd December, 1998 In H.C.C.C.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPEAL NO.53 OF 1993 MAJOR JOSEPH MWETERI IGWETA.............................APPELLANT VERSUS 1. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL...........................................................RESPONDENTS (Being an appeal from the ruling of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Justice Shields) dated 25th October, 1990 in H.C.C.A.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: GICHERU, LAKHA & OWUOR, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 171 OF 1995 BETWEEN ROYAL MEDIA SERVICES LTD.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: OWUOR, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPEAL NO.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: KWACH, TUNOI & LAKHA, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 250 OF 1998 BETWEEN MIGWANI FAMILY HELPERS PROJECT ......................APPELLANT AND HAMIDAS BOUTIQUE.....................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Machakos (Hon.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: KWACH, TUNOI & LAKHA, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NUMBER 219 OF 1998 BETWEEN GALAXY PAINTS COMPANY LIMITED ...................... APPELLANT AND FALCON GUARDS LIMITED .............................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: GICHERU, TUNOI & LAKHA, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. RAILA AMOLO ODINGA CHARLES MARANGA ....................................APPELLANTS AND PEREZ MALANDE OLINDO REV.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS Civil Appeal 62 of 1995 AHMED ABUBAR & OTHERS …………………….. APPELLANTS VERSUS BAKARI BARAKA & 5 OTHERS ………..........…RESPONDENTS From Original Civil Suit No.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
what I need to consider in this taxation bearing in mind the Authorities cited, I have come to a conclusion that Ksh.120,000/= would be reasonable fee for instructions in this appeal which I allow. Ksh.180,000/= is taxed off from this item.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
decision of Lakha, J.A., a learned single judge of this Court, to seek to vary, discharge or reverse his order by the Court under the provisions of rule 54 (2) of the Rules. Oraro has submitted that the respondent having not chosen any of those options he cannot now challenge the consent order which he has not attempted to have set aside.