Search court decisions

…The Respondent, who had acted as the Appellant’s advocate in the said property sales transaction, filed a defence in which he contended Appellant’s parents owed him money from earlier dealings thus entitling him to retain…

…Advocates Mr. Mungai, instructed by BA Okwiry & Associates, Advocates for the appellant. Mr. Jumba, instructed by Balongo & Company, Advocates for the respondent.…

…He urged that the Applicant should deposit the entire decretal sum into a joint interest earning account in the names of the two advocates for the parties. 17.…

…Advocates & 2 others [2014] eKLR, where the court stated: - “The purpose of the security needed under Order 42 is to guarantee the due performance of such decree or order as may ultimately be binding on the Applicant.…

…He discovered the documents he gave the advocates were not genuine. In reexamination he stated that the deposit was after search was conducted. He stated that the balance was paid.…

…The court erred in respect of Ksh. 118,650/= whether or not the money is refundable, is a dispute between an advocate and it cannot be recovered as a civil debt. The last aspect is Ksh.…

…against advocates are filed. b) That a complaint against an Advocate cannot on the first instance be filed in the small claims court as the doctrine of exhaustion of remedies bestows the Advocates Complaints Comission with…

…may order the Advocate to pay to the complainant such sums as it finds to be due from the Advocate” 12) The above provisions clearly acknowledgment that a party who has a complaint of professional misconduct against an Advocate…

…Advocates Mr. Okeyo, instructed by Okeyo Ochiel & Company, Advocates for the respondents.…

…Advocates.…

…Advocates and Mathai & Co. Advocates together with the interests thereto be released to the respondent/applicant herein. 3) Cost of this application be borne by the Appellant/Respondent. 11.…

…In Nyamogo & Nyamogo Advocates v Kago [2001] 1 EA 173 the Court of Appeal made this point as follows: “... There is a real distinction between a mere erroneous decision and an error apparent on the face of the record.…

…Advocates Ms. Kamau, instructed by COOTOW & Associates, Advocates for the appellant. Mr. Makumi, instructed by J. Makumi & Company, Advocates for the 1st respondent.…

…Advocates Ms. Kamau, instructed by COOTOW & Associates, Advocates for the appellant. Mr. Makumi, instructed by J. Makumi & Company, Advocates for the 1st respondent.…

…The went on to submit that there was no proper service of hearing notices upon her advocate, thereby denying her the right to be heard.…

…The Appellant entered appearance and filed a Statement of Defence through the firm of Okong’o Wandago & Company Advocates. 46.…

…Advocates Ms. Arasa, instructed by Omwenga-Arasa & Company, Advocates for the appellant. Mr. Sichangi, instructed by PC Onduso & Company, Advocates for the respondent.…

…The record shows that the 1st Respondent instituted garnishee proceedings in the subordinate court against the 2nd and 3rd Respondents, who were judgment debtors, and joined the Applicant, a firm of advocates, as an interested…

…contrary to Section 45 of the Advocates Act.…

…Upon considering the certificate of urgency issued by Hildah Kemunto advocate for the appellant on 14th June 2026, on the purport and effect of the order issued by the late Justice Majanja on 6. 12. 2023, I do hereby review…