Search court decisions

…The evidence with regard to notice is that on september 8, 1986, the respondent notified the appellant in writing that if, the appellant, had neglected to pay the outstanding amount of shs.5,218,062.70.…

…was the case here, could not exercise the power of sale unless the appellant failed to comply within three months of the date of September, 8, 1986, with a ”further notice• served on him under sub-section (2) There is no evidence…

…There was no evidence before the Court to that eect and there were no evidence to show that the appellant was a party to the signing of Matiba’s nomination papers or even knew anything about them.…

…If there was such evidence it could have been used against the second respondent but certainly could not be used against the appellant. 43.…