Search court decisions

…The court found that the medical evidence proved penetration, and that the same was by the appellant.…

…The appellant alleges that the medical evidence was imsy, yet he has not demonstrated how that was so. Both PW1 and himself were examined by PW2, within hours of the occurrence of the events.…

…The medical evidence established that the deceased had a compound fracture on both forearms and also on the occipital area. The cause of death being the said multiple injuries leading to celebral haemorrhage.…

…The only medical evidence adduced was that of an Orthopaedic Surgeon who reported on the plaintiff on June 18th, 1986. Dr Khandwalla assessed the plaintiff’s age as 56 years and found a head and dental injury.…

…Medical evidence was that at his age, and with the kind of injury he sustained, a man is not suitable for a watchman’s job. His employer was prepared to continue to employ him.…

…In a judgement which ran into twenty pages of typescript and which is difficult to fault, the learned Judge summarised the 1st respondent’s injuries and related the medical evidence and the prognosis of the 1st respondent…

…He was not prepared to question the medical evidence as to the extent and severity of the 1st respondent’s injuries nor the rather dismal prognosis made by the doctors.…

…That medical evidence talks of beating in general yet from the evidence the deceased was beaten several times.…

…The medical evidence did not establish which blow caused the fatal injury or that both blows were fatal.…

…There may be cases where medical evidence may be misleading enough to enable one judge to grant such leave but when correct medical data may be brought forward by the defendant, the picture may drastically change.…