Search court decisions

…The application to strike out the plaint is thus premature and is an abuse of the court process”.…

…The application to strike out her plaint is thus premature and is an abuse of the court process.…

…The application to strike out the plaint is thus premature and is an abuse of the court process”.…

…The application to strike out her plaint is thus premature and is an abuse of the court process.…

…7 Are these proceedings an abuse of the court process and should they be struck out and (sic) on this ground alone. 8 Is the 1st interested party (Kenya Sugar Board) entitled to regulate the quota in law?…

…Issue No. 7: The proceedings were an abuse of court process since the grounds relied on in Misc. 646/04 are relitigated in Misc. 946/04.…

…The application is tailored at buying time for the applicant and thus is an abuse of court process. 2.…

…The court lacked jurisdiction because judgment had been delivered, the court was functus officio and could not entertain the application especially that the application was for review and the respondent had preferred an appeal…

…The application was an abuse of the court process and intended to embarrass this Honourable court; ii.…

…His finding was that institution of the present application for revision when Constitutional Petition No. 50 of 2020 was subsisting was an abuse of the court process.…

…The application is tailored at buying time for the applicant and thus is an abuse of court process. 2.…

…The court lacked jurisdiction because judgment had been delivered, the court was functus officio and could not entertain the application especially that the application was for review and the respondent had preferred an appeal…

…He deponed that the Application and Petition are an abuse of the court process and ought to be struck out in limine. 3rd Respondent’s Replying Adavit 9.…

…The instant Application and Petition is an attempt to sanitize the Petitioner’s criminal and illegal activities, and is an abuse of the process of court as the Petitioner has approached court with unclean hands.…

…He deponed that the Application and Petition are an abuse of the court process and ought to be struck out in limine. 3rd Respondent’s Replying Adavit 9.…

…The instant Application and Petition is an attempt to sanitize the Petitioner’s criminal and illegal activities, and is an abuse of the process of court as the Petitioner has approached court with unclean hands.…

…He deponed that the Application and Petition are an abuse of the court process and ought to be struck out in limine. 3rd Respondent’s Replying Adavit 9.…

…The instant Application and Petition is an attempt to sanitize the Petitioner’s criminal and illegal activities, and is an abuse of the process of court as the Petitioner has approached court with unclean hands.…

…They are not protected as they would be if they were executing court process by virtue of section 6 of the Judicature Act Cap 8.…

…He urged the Court to nd that the applicants are abusing the Court process, and acting in contempt of Court. 35.…

…He urged the Court to nd that the applicants are blatantly abusing Court process, and are acting in contempt of Court, with a sense of impunity. 62.…

…For the appellant to purport to resurrect the issue three years after the determination of his appeal is a clear indication that the petition is frivolous and an abuse of the Court process.…

…of the court.…

…of the Court.…

…of court.…

…That refusal was viewed by the respondents as unreasonable and amounted to an abuse of the process of the court.…