Judgment[1997] KEHC 5
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
I make no finding on theactions of Sebastian as his case abated upon his death pendingconclusion of the trial. The case against Mwakalamu KISHUSHU has not been proved beyondreasonable doubt and I find him not guilty.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA Criminal Case 49 of 1995 REPUBLIC…………………....………..………………..PROSECUTOR VERSUS CHARO NZAI KATANA..........................
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: OMOLO, LAKHA JJ.A. J.A.) CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Winding Up Cause 3 of 1996 In The Matter of Kenya National Trading Corporation Ltd and In The Matter of Companies Act Ruling. This is an application to set aside and or review the winding up order of November 3, 1997.
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Winding Up Cause 12 of 1986 In The Matter of Plastic Products (K) Ltd and In The Matter of The Companies Act, CAP 486 Judgment. By a petition presented in court on 14th May, 1996, Mepal Plastics Kenya Limited, seeks a winding up order against Plastics Products (K) Ltd.
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CORAM: TUNOI, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
That according to the company it has repaid the entire loan and has complied with the consent order aforesaid and is disputing the Kshs 7,228,478/85. In any event the company has secured payment due to the Petitioner by a charge over Title No NDUMBERI/NDUMBERI/T.613/30.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CRIMINAL CASE NO 638 OF 1992 ABEDINEGO MUTISO MUSYOKI …………..APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC……………………..............……RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
then ordered that the said occupants be summoned to appear before it to show cause why a closing order should not be made. The affected tenants duly appeared before the Court including an employee of the applicant known as Harrison Mulwa.
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Winding Up Cause 38, 39 & 40 of 1991 In the Matter of Avitech Limited, Aircraft Engineering Services Ltd & Rent-A-Plane Ltd and In the Matter of the Companies Act Ruling. Three matters have been raised before me today for clarification.
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
REPUBLIC OF KENYA HIGH COURT, AT NAIROBI PROBATE & ADMINISTRATION NO 112 OF 1987 SARAH WAIRIMU KANGI ………….…..….. APPLICANT VERSUS MARGARET WAGATE NYAMU …....…….
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS CRIMINAL CASE NO.44 OF 1991 TOM PIEMO OMBURA …………) SHIKUDHANI AJWANG RUMAYA ………………. ACCUSEDS VERSUS REPUBLIC ………………… ………………… ……….
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI DIVORCE CAUSE NO 37 OF 1990 A K ...........................................PETITIONER VERSUS Z N K......................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Winding Up Cause 30 of 1989 M Weiss Ltd v The Companies Act(Cap 486) Ruling. This is an application by way of Chamber Summons under the provisions of Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, inherent jurisdiction of the court, the Winding Up rules and all enabling provisions of law for orders that the petition be struck out on the grounds that it is in breach of 10 of the Winding Up rules and S.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
The intention as can be detected from the evidence was to beat the two boys in order to get them to produce the money. The next question is whether the intention to beat or chastise the deceased and Crispo so that they produce the stolen money was a common intention shared by all the four accused persons at the time they were beating the two boys.
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Winding Up Cause 11 of 1991 In The Matter of East African Road Services Ltd and In The Matter of The Companies Act Ruling. By its petition filed in this court on 16th April, 1991, Kenya Shell Limited, a limited liability company (hereinafter called the petitioner ) seeks an order for winding up of East African Road Services Limited, a limited liability company with its registered office in Nairobi (here in after called
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
Receiver comes, he has to move the creditors to allow him to sell his properties by private treaty in order to pay and get off the hook? Well that is left to him with his counsel.
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Bankruptcy & Winding-Up Cause 8 of 1990 Kimemia ......................................................................................... APPLICANT versus Commercial Bank of Africa Ltd ..........................................RESPONDENT RULING This is an application to set aside the receiving order given on 14/2/91 against the appellant – Debtor.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISUMU crim apps 235,236,238 of 90 GARI & 2 OTHERS………..…………..PLAINTIFF V REPUBLIC……………………….………DEFENDANT ed) (From Original Conviction and Sentence of the Principal Magistrate’s Court at Kisumu (C.O. Ong’undi, Esq, P.M.) in Criminal Case No 189 of 1989) Evidence – secondary evidence – notice to produce a document – Evidence Act (cap 80) section 69 – to whom such notice is given – when such notice can be dispensed with – party who does not have po
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: KNELLER, HANCOX & NYARANGI JJA) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 177 OF 1984 BETWEEN KARIUKI & ANOTHER .................... APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC......................................