Skip to content
JudgmentUnilever Kenya Limited VS Caroline Ntinyari2 min read

Unilever Kenya Limited VS Caroline Ntinyari

Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC) · · Stephen Radido

Summary

On 6 June 2024, the court directed parties to take dates at the registry for formal proof and proceeded with the cause as undefended. The respondent filed a motion on 25 September 2024 seeking review of the June 6 orders and leave to defend. The court allowed the motion, setting aside the June 6 order, admitting the respondent's submissions as filed, and ordering each party to bear their own costs. The court noted the consent agreement referenced June 26 instead of June 6, but allowed the motion based on the parties' consent and the absence of objection from the claimant.

1. On 6 June 2024, when the Cause came up for directions, the parties did not attend and the Court directed:
Parties to take dates at the Registry for formal proof. Cause to proceed as undefended Cause.
2. The order prompted Caroline Ntinyari (the Respondent) to file a Motion dated 25 September 2024, seeking a review of the directions/orders of 6 June 2024 and grant of leave to defend.
3. The Court gave directions on the Motion on 6 November 2024, and the Respondent filed submissions on 21 November 2024.
4. On 3 December 2024, the parties filed a consent in the following terms:
The Respondent’s Notice of Motion application dated 25th September 2024 is hereby marked as settled in the following terms:
(a)  The orders of this Honourable Court issued on 26th June 2024 directing that the parties take dates at the registry for formal proof and the case to proceed as undefended cause to be and are hereby set aside.
(b)  The Respondent’s Response to the Statement of Claim and List of Witnesses both dated 7th May 2024 and the Respondent’s Witness Statement and List of Documents both dated 27th May 2024 be and are hereby deemed as duly filed and properly on record.
(c)  There be no order as to costs of the application aforesaid.
5. The directions/orders of the Court sought to be reviewed were not issued on 26 June 2024. They were issued on 6 June 2024. Consequently, the consent agreement between the parties refers to directions/orders not given by the Court.
6. The Court is unable to discern whether the reference to 26 June 2024 and not 6 June 2024 is an inadvertent error or just a typographical error since the Motion sought to be compromised also indicated the date of the Court orders as 26 June 2024.
7. The Claimant did not file any response in objection to the Respondent’s Motion. It did not file submissions.
8. Considering the above, the Court allows the Motion dated 25 September 2024 as follows:
(i) The order that the Cause proceeds as undefended issued on 6 June 2024 is set aside.
(ii) The Respondent’s Response, witness statements and documents are admitted onto the record.
(iii) Each party to bear own costs of the Motion.
    Unilever Kenya Limited VS Caroline Ntinyari Unilever Kenya Limited VS Caroline Ntinyari