1. I considered the application dated 12th May 2025. In my ruling, I ordered that the same be served for interpartes hearing on 27th May 2025. I was not persuaded that interim orders ought to issue.
2. The Plaintiff/Applicant has filed an application dated 13th May 2025, praying that I review my previous ruling. In the new application a copy of the newspaper cutting has been annexed. The proposed sale was advertised in the 29th April 2025 edition of the Standard newspaper. The Plaintiff/Applicant approached the Court on 12th May 2025. No proper explanation has been given for the delay in filing the application. The Plaintiff/Applicant seeks an equitable remedy of an injunction. As the maxim goes, equity aids the vigilant, not the indolent.
3. In the circumstances, I am unable to disturb my previous finding. The application for injunction will therefore be heard on 27th May 2025 as earlier scheduled.
4. Costs will be in the cause.