- In cross-examination regarding the evidence of PW9 Chief Inspector Pius Chelimo, the defence raised issues that challenged the process and procedure of obtaining the statement recorded from the accused person.
- As a consequence, this court considered the contents of the statement to have been challenged as well as its admissibility in evidence.
- The court thus treated the statement as contested and gave the appellant a chance to tender evidence to challenge the statement in a trial within a trial, and be cross-examined in order to determine its admissibility.
- When the accused was however given a chance to tender evidence on his side on what might have transpired regarding the recorded statement, he elected to keep quiet which is his constitutional right.
- In effect therefore, the statement which had already been produced in evidence as exhibit 8 not being challenged as to its admissibility, is hereby admitted in evidence, and will be considered alongside other evidence in determining this case.
Dated, signed and delivered this 27th day of June 2024 in open court at Voi.
In the presence of:-
Alfred/Trizah – Court Assistants
Mr. Sirima for State
Mr. Mosioma for accused – virtual
Accused – virtual