Skip to content
JudgmentRAHITO INVESTMENTS LIMITED VS DANIEL KIPLAGAT KIRUI AND AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND 1 Others1 min read

RAHITO INVESTMENTS LIMITED VS DANIEL KIPLAGAT KIRUI AND AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND 1 Others

Environment and Land Court at Naivasha Environment and Land Court · · Oundo M Clausina

I have considered the contents of the application, dated 18th May 2026, in which the Applicant seeks to arrest the ruling scheduled for 28th May 2026 and, in the alternative, to issue interim injunctive orders, thereby restraining the Plaintiff/Respondent, either by itself or through its servants, agents, employees, assigns, hoodlums, and/or any other persons acting under its instructions, from trespassing, entering, fencing, surveying, constructing upon, demolishing structures, leasing, alienating, and/or interfering with Land Reference Number 28068/79 in any manner whatsoever. The Applicant further seeks that the Plaintiff/Respondent be cited for contempt and/or restrained for violating the status quo orders issued on 19th March 2026.
The Application is not certified as urgent. However, the same should be served upon the Respondents, within the cause of today, who shall then file their response within 7 days upon service. The matter shall be mentioned for further directions on 28th May 2026. 

Details

Delivered

Related decisions

Published for information only — not legal advice. Check the official record before relying on this text. Talk to an advocate