1. The Applicants, High Nutrition and Health Limited (1st Applicant) and Prime Bank Limited (2nd Applicant), moved this Court by a Notice of Motion expressed to be brought under the Companies Act, 2015—particularly section 888—seeking, inter alia, an order extending time within which to register a debenture executed between the parties.
2. The motion is accompanied by a Certificate of Urgency sworn by Liza Mutungi, Advocate, who avers that the matter is urgent because the debenture secures an amount of Kenya Shillings 37,200,000, and unless the instrument is registered, the Bank’s security remains unsecured.
3. The application is supported by the Supporting Affidavit of Liza Mutungi, sworn on 20th January 2026, which sets out the factual basis for the delay and prays for the Court’s discretion to enlarge time to permit registration.
4. Ms. Mutungi deponed that the 1st Applicant executed a Debenture dated 20th November 2025 in favour of the 2nd Applicant. The deponent states she prepared the instrument and annexed it as Exhibit “LM 1”. (The affidavit records that the debenture has not yet been registered at the Companies Registry.)
5. It is averred that while stamp duty was paid within time, the e-Citizen system failed to recognise the payment of the Companies Registry filing fees within the prescribed period, causing the payment to reflect outside the 30-day window; further, the Registry could not manually correct the anomaly. Consequently, registration of the debenture could not be approved within time.
6. The Applicants therefore seek an order that time be extended by thirty (30) days from the date of the Court’s order to register the debenture pursuant to section 888(2)(b) of the Companies Act, 2015.
Analysis and Determination
7. From the application and affidavit material, the sole issue for determination is whether the Applicants have laid a sufficient basis for enlargement of time to register the debenture outside the statutory period.
8. Section 888(1) permits the Court to intervene where failure to register a charge within time was due to accident, inadvertence, or reasonable cause, or where delay is not prejudicial to creditors or members. The Court may extend time if it is just and equitable to do so under section 888(2).
9. In ABSA Bank Kenya PLC v Browns East Africa Plantations PLC (2026), this Court extended time to register a charge where delay was caused by operational difficulties with the online Companies Registry system, confirming that reasonable cause and absence of prejudice justify relief under section 888.
10. Likewise, in Kenagro Suppliers Ltd – Ex Parte (2026), the Court granted a 30-day extension where counsel’s inadvertence caused late registration, holding that section 888 is a remedial provision intended to prevent injustice where no prejudice is shown.
11. The present case falls squarely within these principles. The delay arose from a system failure, not neglect; no third party prejudice is demonstrated; and the Bank’s secured position depends on regularization.
12. Accordingly, the Court finds the application merited, and hereby issues the following orders: -
i. Time for registration of the Debenture dated 20th November 2025 is extended by thirty (30) days from the date of this ruling, pursuant to section 888(2)(b) of the Companies Act, 2015.
ii. The Companies Registry/Business Registration Service shall accept the instrument for registration within the extended period.
iii. There shall be no orders as to costs.
13. It is so ordered.
SIGNED, DATED, and DELIVERED IN VIRTUAL COURT THIS
26TH JANUARY 2026
ADO MOSES
JUDGE
2. The motion is accompanied by a Certificate of Urgency sworn by Liza Mutungi, Advocate, who avers that the matter is urgent because the debenture secures an amount of Kenya Shillings 37,200,000, and unless the instrument is registered, the Bank’s security remains unsecured.
3. The application is supported by the Supporting Affidavit of Liza Mutungi, sworn on 20th January 2026, which sets out the factual basis for the delay and prays for the Court’s discretion to enlarge time to permit registration.
4. Ms. Mutungi deponed that the 1st Applicant executed a Debenture dated 20th November 2025 in favour of the 2nd Applicant. The deponent states she prepared the instrument and annexed it as Exhibit “LM 1”. (The affidavit records that the debenture has not yet been registered at the Companies Registry.)
5. It is averred that while stamp duty was paid within time, the e-Citizen system failed to recognise the payment of the Companies Registry filing fees within the prescribed period, causing the payment to reflect outside the 30-day window; further, the Registry could not manually correct the anomaly. Consequently, registration of the debenture could not be approved within time.
6. The Applicants therefore seek an order that time be extended by thirty (30) days from the date of the Court’s order to register the debenture pursuant to section 888(2)(b) of the Companies Act, 2015.
Analysis and Determination
7. From the application and affidavit material, the sole issue for determination is whether the Applicants have laid a sufficient basis for enlargement of time to register the debenture outside the statutory period.
8. Section 888(1) permits the Court to intervene where failure to register a charge within time was due to accident, inadvertence, or reasonable cause, or where delay is not prejudicial to creditors or members. The Court may extend time if it is just and equitable to do so under section 888(2).
9. In ABSA Bank Kenya PLC v Browns East Africa Plantations PLC (2026), this Court extended time to register a charge where delay was caused by operational difficulties with the online Companies Registry system, confirming that reasonable cause and absence of prejudice justify relief under section 888.
10. Likewise, in Kenagro Suppliers Ltd – Ex Parte (2026), the Court granted a 30-day extension where counsel’s inadvertence caused late registration, holding that section 888 is a remedial provision intended to prevent injustice where no prejudice is shown.
11. The present case falls squarely within these principles. The delay arose from a system failure, not neglect; no third party prejudice is demonstrated; and the Bank’s secured position depends on regularization.
12. Accordingly, the Court finds the application merited, and hereby issues the following orders: -
i. Time for registration of the Debenture dated 20th November 2025 is extended by thirty (30) days from the date of this ruling, pursuant to section 888(2)(b) of the Companies Act, 2015.
ii. The Companies Registry/Business Registration Service shall accept the instrument for registration within the extended period.
iii. There shall be no orders as to costs.
13. It is so ordered.
SIGNED, DATED, and DELIVERED IN VIRTUAL COURT THIS
26TH JANUARY 2026
ADO MOSES
JUDGE