Skip to content
JudgmentNAIROBI CITY COUNTY VS IRIS PROPERTIES LIMITED AND PROLAND LIMITED1 min read

NAIROBI CITY COUNTY VS IRIS PROPERTIES LIMITED AND PROLAND LIMITED

High Court at Milimani High Court · · M.S.Shariff

RULING
1. The Respondents herein have approached this court vide a Notice of Motion dated 14Th August 2026, supported by an affidavit of Fredrick K Mungai, and premised upon the provisions of inter alia Order 9 Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Rules, wherein they crave for leave to change their advocates on record from Julius Juma & Company Advocates and Mungu & Company Advocates to Ngatia & Associates.
2. Mr Fredirck K Mungai has deposed that the respondents’ advocates currently on record have duly consented to the proposed change of advocates.
3. I have during checked the CTS and I have confirmed that a consent to change advocates dated 13.8.2026 has been filed and as such this application is well merited, wherefore I allow it and I proceed to make the following orders;
i) THAT the Respondents/Applicants are hereby granted this Court’s leave to change their advocates from Julius Juma & Company Advocates and Mungu & Company Advocates to Ngatia & Associates.
ii) The Respondents shall bear their own costs of this application.
IT IS HEREBY SO ORDERED
Delivered, Signed and Dated at Milimani this 18th day of August 2026.
M. S. Shariff
Judge
    NAIROBI CITY COUNTY VS IRIS PROPERTIES LIMITED AND PROLAND LIMITED NAIROBI CITY COUNTY VS IRIS PROPERTIES LIMITED AND PROLAND LIMITED