'1. Notice of motion dated July 17, 2025, came for directions on September 22, 2025.
2. The court, prima facie, upon reviewing the petition and the pending application, did not identify any constitutional issues worth invoking this court''s jurisdiction as a constitutional court.
3. Consequently, the court instructed the applicant''s counsel to submit brief submissions outlining the constitutional issues deserving of consideration by this court and scheduled the ruling for October 29, 2025.
4. By the time this court was writing its ruling, no submissions had been filed.
5. The failure to file submissions leads this court to conclude that counsel had nothing substantial to present in support of the pending motion.
6. Therefore, the motion dated July 17, 2025, is hereby dismissed.
Dated, signed, and delivered virtually at Malindi on October 29, 2025, in the presence of Happy, the court assistant, and in the absence of parties who were aware of the ruling date.
E. K. MAKORI
JUDGE
'
2. The court, prima facie, upon reviewing the petition and the pending application, did not identify any constitutional issues worth invoking this court''s jurisdiction as a constitutional court.
3. Consequently, the court instructed the applicant''s counsel to submit brief submissions outlining the constitutional issues deserving of consideration by this court and scheduled the ruling for October 29, 2025.
4. By the time this court was writing its ruling, no submissions had been filed.
5. The failure to file submissions leads this court to conclude that counsel had nothing substantial to present in support of the pending motion.
6. Therefore, the motion dated July 17, 2025, is hereby dismissed.
Dated, signed, and delivered virtually at Malindi on October 29, 2025, in the presence of Happy, the court assistant, and in the absence of parties who were aware of the ruling date.
E. K. MAKORI
JUDGE
'