Skip to content
JudgmentMERCY ATIENO OMOLLO VS The Republic1 min read

MERCY ATIENO OMOLLO VS The Republic

High Court at Kisumu High Court · · Joe M. Omido

1. I have considered the Applicant’s Notice of Motion dated 30th April, 2025 that seeks sentence review.

2. Although the application seeks for an alternative sentence of probation, I note from the trial court’s record that the period of 311 days that the Applicant remained in remand custody while her trial proceeded was not taken into account by the sentencing court as is mandatorily required under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

3. That being the case, I proceed to review the Applicant’s sentence of 15 months imprisonment (one year imprisonment on count 1; and 5 months imprisonment on count 2) to the extent that the period from 1st September, 2023 to 7th May, 2024 (311 days) that she was in custody shall be deducted from the sentence of 15 months imprisonment.

4. This file is hereby closed.

DELIVERED, DATED and SIGNED this 28th day of July, 2025.

JOE M. OMIDO
JUDGE
APPLICANT: Present, virtually.
FOR THE RESPONDENT: Ms. Jebichii, Prosecution Counsel.
COURT ASSISTANTS: Mr. Ngoge & Mr. Juma.
    MERCY ATIENO OMOLLO VS The Republic MERCY ATIENO OMOLLO VS The Republic