Skip to content
JudgmentMATHEW EKISA EKIRA VS HON.OKU KAUNYA (PSC) AND TESO NORTH CONSTITUENCY1 min read

MATHEW EKISA EKIRA VS HON.OKU KAUNYA (PSC) AND TESO NORTH CONSTITUENCY

Employment and Labour Relations Court at Bungoma ELRC · · Jemimah Wanza Keli

Summary

The court certified the application as urgent and granted leave to the firm of P.I SAMBA& COMPANY advocates to appear for the 1st Respondent, deeming the Notice of Change of Advocates as filed upon payment of fees. The application for stay was deemed brought too late after judgment, and the court ordered the application to be heard inter partes on 13th March 2024 for responses and further proceedings.

The application dated 28th feb 2024 placed before me under certificate of urgency was considered exparte.   The application for the stay is brought way long time after judgment.   I issue  the following orders:-

1. The application is certified urgent 

2. Leave is  granted to the firm of P.I SAMBA& COMPANY advocates to come on record for the 1sl Respondent and the Notice of Change of Advocates attached hereto be deemed as duly filed upon payment of requisite court filing fees.

3. The application be served for response and is  ordered to be heard inter- partes on the 13th March 2024 on all other prayers.

It is so ordered.

Dated 29th Feb 2024 at Kakamega

J.W. Keli 

    MATHEW EKISA EKIRA VS HON.OKU KAUNYA (PSC) AND TESO NORTH CONSTITUENCY MATHEW EKISA EKIRA VS HON.OKU KAUNYA (PSC) AND TESO NORTH CONSTITUENCY