Skip to content
JudgmentJOSEPH MUSEMBI NZILA VS ODPP2 min read

JOSEPH MUSEMBI NZILA VS ODPP

High Court at Makueni High Court · · Matheka, Teresia Mumbua


RULING
1. The  applicant    has  approached this  court  vide  an undated  notice  of  motion  brought    under section  333(2)  of the  Criminal  Procedure Code.
2. He  seeks   the  prayer  that   his   sentence  be  reviewed  by  this  court taking into  account  the  period   he  spent  in custody  before he  was sentenced.
3. His application is supported by his affidavit sworn on   an unknown date.
4. He  depones   that  before  he  was sentenced     to  18  months  on 30/10/2024  he  had  served  7  months  in remand    having  been  arrested   on  19/3/2024.
5. I  have  perused  the  record in Kilungu  MCCR E184/2024  where   applicant  was the 3rd  accused.
6. Charge sheet shows date of arrest as 19/3/2024.
7. On 30/10/2024  he was sentenced  to pay fine  of  Kshs. 100,000  in  default   to serve  18  months  imprisonment.
8. The charge  was stealing stock  contrary  to section   278  of  Penal  Code,  the  alternative  being  handling   stolen goods contrary  to  section  322(1) of   the same code. The accused   persons were found guilty   of   and convicted   of the main charge . The cattle   were recovered.
9. s. 278 of the Penal Code provides  for  a  term  of  imprisonment  of not  more than  14 years  for  the person  found    guilty  of  that  offence. The trial court exercised its discretion in determining the sentence .
10. In sentencing;   the  1st  & 3rd  accused  were  sentenced   to  12  months’ probation    supervision  and  fine   and  imprisonment   respectively.
11. Where there are no express provisions regarding the fines and default terms the  maximum  default sentence for the  exceeding  Kshs. 50,000  is  12 months   as per  section  28(2) of  the    Penal  Code
12. Section  278  of  the Penal  Code  does  not  have  express   provisions  on  default   sentence  where fine  has  been   imposed.
13. It  is  also evident from the record that  the  trial  court  did  not  indicate  in the sentence     that  the court  had  taken into consideration   the period  the applicant  had  spent  in custody prior   to the sentence.
14. In the exercise of the supervisory powers of this court under Article 165(6) & (7) of Constitution of  Kenya   2010 and sections   362 to 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code, I  revise  the  sentence  thus:-
15. That the applicant is sentenced   to pay    a fine of Kshs. 100,000 in default   to serve 12 months   imprisonment. Default  sentence   to run  from  the date  of arrest.
Orders accordingly.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 9TH APRIL 2025
MUMBUA T MATHEKA
JUDGE
CA CHRISPOL
APPLICANT PRESENT
KAZUNGU FOR STATE

    JOSEPH MUSEMBI NZILA VS ODPP JOSEPH MUSEMBI NZILA VS ODPP