1. I have considered the Application dated 1st April, 2025 in which the Applicant seeks an order for review of his sentence so that the period that he spent in custody be considered.
2. From the record of the trial court, the Applicant was arraigned on 4th April, 2022 and was remanded in custody. He remained in custody until 6th December, 2024 when he was sentenced to serve 40 years imprisonment. The Applicant complains that the trial court did not direct that his sentence commences form the date was first remanded.
3. Having carefully considered the application, I reach the persuasion that the same cannot succeed for two reasons:
i) This court does not have supervisory jurisdiction over a court (Judge) of concurrent jurisdiction. Put in another way, I cannot vary another High Court Judge’s orders/sentence.
ii) I note that the sentencing court ordered that the sentence of 40 years runs from 19th March, 2022, a date that is before the Applicant’s arraignment. The period that the Applicant spent in custody was therefore considered by the sentencing court.
4. All the foregoing considered, I find the Applicant’s motion 1st April, 2025 to lack merit and I proceed to dismiss the same.
5. This file is hereby closed.
DELIVERED, DATED and SIGNED this 28th day of July, 2025.
JOE M. OMIDO
JUDGE
APPLICANT: Present, virtually.
FOR THE RESPONDENT: Ms. Jebichii, Prosecution Counsel.
COURT ASSISTANTS: Mr. Ngoge & Mr. Juma.
2. From the record of the trial court, the Applicant was arraigned on 4th April, 2022 and was remanded in custody. He remained in custody until 6th December, 2024 when he was sentenced to serve 40 years imprisonment. The Applicant complains that the trial court did not direct that his sentence commences form the date was first remanded.
3. Having carefully considered the application, I reach the persuasion that the same cannot succeed for two reasons:
i) This court does not have supervisory jurisdiction over a court (Judge) of concurrent jurisdiction. Put in another way, I cannot vary another High Court Judge’s orders/sentence.
ii) I note that the sentencing court ordered that the sentence of 40 years runs from 19th March, 2022, a date that is before the Applicant’s arraignment. The period that the Applicant spent in custody was therefore considered by the sentencing court.
4. All the foregoing considered, I find the Applicant’s motion 1st April, 2025 to lack merit and I proceed to dismiss the same.
5. This file is hereby closed.
DELIVERED, DATED and SIGNED this 28th day of July, 2025.
JOE M. OMIDO
JUDGE
APPLICANT: Present, virtually.
FOR THE RESPONDENT: Ms. Jebichii, Prosecution Counsel.
COURT ASSISTANTS: Mr. Ngoge & Mr. Juma.