Skip to content
JudgmentHEXING TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LIMITED VS KENYA POWER & LIGHTING COMPANY LIMITED AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER, KENYA POWER & LIGHTING COMPANY PLC AND 8 Others2 min read

HEXING TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LIMITED VS KENYA POWER & LIGHTING COMPANY LIMITED AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER, KENYA POWER & LIGHTING COMPANY PLC AND 8 Others

High Court at Milimani High Court · · R. E. Aburili

' REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
JUDICIAL REVIEW DIVISION
JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION NO E347 OF 2025
HEXING TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LIMITED…………………….…..APPLICANT
VERSUS
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT ADMINISTRATIVE
REVEIW BOARD.…………………………………………………..…. 1 ST RESPONDENT
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MANAGING DIRECTOR,
KENYA POWER & LIGHTING COMPANY PLC………………….2 ND RESPONDENT
KENYA POWER & LIGHTING COMPANY PLC………………....3 RD RESPONDENT
VERSUS
CHINT METERS & ELECTRIC KENYA
COMPANY LIMITED…………………………………………1 ST INTERESTED PARTY
EAST AFRICA METER COMPANY LTD……….………….2 ND INTERESTED PARTY
INHEMETER AFRICA COMPANY LIMITED………….…3 RD INTERESTED PARTY
SMART METER TECHNOLOGY LIMITED……………….4 TH INTERESTED PARTY
ABCOS INDUSTRIAL LIMITED………………………….…5 TH INTERESTED PARTY
MAGNATE VENTURES LIMITED……………………….…..6 TH INTERESTE PARTY
HOUSE OF PROCUREMENT LIMITED………………..….7 TH INTERESTED PARTY
RULING
The Originating Motion dated 4/11/2025 seeks Judicial Review orders of prohibition, Declaration, certiorari and mandamus challenging the 1 st Respondent’s decision made on 23/10/2025 in Public Procurement Request for Review Application No.85/2025 in respect of Tender No.KPI/9A.3/RT/14/24-25 for supply of single-phase smart meters (Local Manufactures and Assemblers). The application is brought under certificate of urgency dated 4/11/2025.
I have read the application and the accompanying documents and supporting affidavit sworn by Liang Gao on 4/11/2025. The applicant also seeks for an interim relief of prohibition prohibiting the 1 st & 2 nd Respondents from implementing the impugned decision of the 1 st Respondent rendered on 23/10/2025. I find the application to be urgent. I certify it as urgent. The applicant is however warned that it did not have to approach the court at the eleventh hour.
On the prayer for interim relief as sought in prayer 2 of the Originating Motion, I am satisfied that unless a stay is granted at this stage, the impugned decision will take effect today thereby rendering these proceedings an academic exercise.
I therefore exercise discretion and grant prayer No.2 of the Originating Motion dated 4/11/2025 as sought. I further direct the applicant to file and serve the Originating Motion upon the Respondents and Interested Parties forthwith by close of business today.
Upon such service, the Respondents and Interested Parties have 5 days to file and serve their responses. The applicant will then have 5 days of the date of service to file and serve a further affidavit if need arises, together with brief written submissions.
Thereafter, the Respondents and Interested Parties shall have 5 days of date of service to file and serve their supplementary affidavit if need arises, together with their brief written submissions.
As these proceedings are strictly time bound, the matter shall be mentioned on 26/11/2025 to fix a judgment date. The timelines given are cast in stone in view of the strict timelines for disposal of these proceedings.
I so order.
Dated, Signed & Delivered in chambers at Nairobi this 6 th Day of November, 2025
R.E. ABURILI
JUDGE
'

Details

Delivered
Court rank
High Court

Related decisions

Published for information only — not legal advice. Check the official record before relying on this text. Talk to an advocate