Skip to content
JudgmentGILBI BUSINESS PARK MANAGEMENT VS PADA SECURITY AND ALARM SYSTEMS2 min read

GILBI BUSINESS PARK MANAGEMENT VS PADA SECURITY AND ALARM SYSTEMS

High Court at Milimani High Court · · Visram Aleem Alnashir

'
1. I have considered the Application dated 1st April, 2025 together with the affidavit filed in in support of even date. The Application seeks to recognize and enforce an arbitral award published 30th January 2025, (“the Award”).

2. The same is not opposed and an affidavit of service dated 25th September, 2025 is available on the court record.

3. The applicant has annexed a certified copy of the Award marked as exhibit HGV4 of the supplementary affidavit and has annexed certified copy of the arbitration agreement between the parties marked as exhibit HGV3 at clause 18.2 of the contract between the parties.

4. The applicable law is found at Section 36 of the Arbitration Act, 1995. The same provides as follows:
Recognition and enforcement of awards

(1) A domestic arbitral award, shall be recognized as binding and, upon
application in writing to the High Court, shall be enforced subject to this section
and section 37.

(2) An international arbitration award shall be recognised as binding and
enforced in accordance to the provisions of the New York Convention or any other
convention to which Kenya is signatory and relating to arbitral awards.

(3) Unless the High Court otherwise orders, the party relying on an arbitral
award or applying for its enforcement must furnish—

(a) the original arbitral award or a duly certified copy of it; and

(b) the original arbitration agreement or a duly certified copy of it.

(4) If the arbitral award or arbitration agreement is not made in the English
language, the party shall furnish a duly certified translation of it into the English
language.

5. Further, I take note that no live application for setting aside or refusal for recognition or enforcement of the Award is pending before the court at present, and further that the statutory time limit for filing such an application to set aside has since elapsed.

6. Having found that the above criteria is met, the Application is allowed the Award dated 30th January 2025 is hereby recognized and enforced as a decree of the court.

7. The file is marked as closed.

'
    GILBI BUSINESS PARK MANAGEMENT VS PADA SECURITY AND ALARM SYSTEMS GILBI BUSINESS PARK MANAGEMENT VS PADA SECURITY AND ALARM SYSTEMS