Skip to content
JudgmentGeoffrey Omwando Kereu VS Accurate Mills Limited3 min read

Geoffrey Omwando Kereu VS Accurate Mills Limited

Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC) · · Jemimah Wanza Keli

Summary

The court dismissed the applicant's application to enforce a Work Injury Benefits Award of Kshs. 1,205,452.80 from the Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services (DOSH) because the uncontroverted evidence showed that the award had been revised to Kshs. 226,022.40 by DOSH on 27th April 2021 and the revised amount had been paid to the applicant. The court found the applicant's advocate's affidavit lacked probative value as the payment was confirmed by DOSH's certificate of payment. The applicant failed to establish that the original award was still valid due to the respondent's payment of the revised amount within the legal timeframe.

1. The applicant applied by way of Notice of Motion dated 7th day of August, 2023 brought under Article 165 of the Constitution of Kenya, Section 12 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, Section 26 and Section 51 of the Work Injury Benefits Act and any other enabling provisions of the law for Orders that:-
a) The Honourable Court do adopt the award of the Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services in the sum of Kshs. 1,205,452.80/- granted in favour of the Applicant against the Respondent as the judgement of the Court.

b) That a Decree do issue accordingly for execution.

c) The Respondent do equally pay the costs of this Application.

Grounds of the application
1. The Applicant was an employee of Accurate Mills Limited the Respondent herein.

2. The Applicant suffered injury while in the course of his employment.

3. The Applicant reported the injury and it was processed as stipulated in the Work Injury Benefits Act.

4. The Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services made an assessment of  injury compensation of Kshs. 1,205,452.80/= as due payable to the Applicant.

5. The Respondent did not object to or appeal the Director's decision within 60 days as by law required, and has not paid the assessed sum or any part thereof.

6. The  application was supported by the sworn affidavit of Geoffrey Omwando Kereu dated 7th august 2023  where he attached the  medical notes , Dosh Form 4 awarding him Kshs. 1,205,452.80 and demand letter dated 11th December 2020.
7. The respondent in opposition to the application filed replying affidavit of Avraj Bhachu  dated 15th December 2023  and asserted that the application had since been reviewed by DOSH following their request for re-assessment  and the same was reviewed to Kshs. 226,022.40 .  They annexed revised DOSH Form 4  dated 27th  April 2021. The deponent further produced evidence of payment of the said money to the employee/applicant where he thump stamped on the 26th May 2021(exhibits AB2 and AB3 were the revised form and the certificate of payment by DOSH).

8. In response to the foregoing, the applicant’s advocate filed Notice of Motion application seeking for review of orders of the court by Justice Ocharo (The Order was for filing of written submission in this application) and for leave to address the court orally on the instant application alleging contradictory awards. The application as supported by the affidavit of his advocate, Namada Simoni. The court considered the application and dismissed the same vide ruling dated 14th January 2025.

Decision
9. The court as stated in ruling dated 14th January 2025 that the miscellaneous application was to enforce the decision of the DOSH. The uncontroverted evidence before the court produced vide replying affidavit of Avraj Bhachu  dated 15th December 2023  was that the award sought to be enforced had since been revised  by DOSH to Kshs. 226,022.40 vide revised DOSH Form 4  dated 27th  April 2021(AB2). The same had since been paid and the certificate of payment produced as AB3.  The injured employee did not dispute the payment. The advocate’s affidavit had no probative value in the application as the payment was received by the client directly as per AB3.

10. In the circumstances, the court finds the application seeking to enforce the Award of 11th December 2020 not tenable given the uncontroverted revised and settled award of 27th April 2021.

11. The application is dismissed with costs to the respondent.

12. It is so Ordered. 

DATED, SIGNED, AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT NAIROBI THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025.

 
    Geoffrey Omwando Kereu VS Accurate Mills Limited Geoffrey Omwando Kereu VS Accurate Mills Limited