Skip to content
JudgmentFRANCIS NYAIHEMBE GATI AND JOHN CHACHA MOGAYA AND 1 Others VS FRANCIS MIKWABE MWITA AND PRICIAN BOKOBORA MWITA AND 5 Others1 min read

FRANCIS NYAIHEMBE GATI AND JOHN CHACHA MOGAYA AND 1 Others VS FRANCIS MIKWABE MWITA AND PRICIAN BOKOBORA MWITA AND 5 Others

Environment and Land Court at Migori Environment and Land Court · · G. A. Ongondo


  1. The instant ruling is in respect of an application by way of a Notice of motion dated 9th July 2024 by the three plaintiffs/applicants through M/S Edward Kisia and Associates Advocates for interim preservation order over the suit land Reference No. Bugumbe/Isebania/344 pending the outcome of this suit.
  2. Mr Kisia learned counsel for the applicant informed the court that the respondents/defendants were duly served as revealed in the affidavit of service sworn on 22nd December 2023 and 22nd February 2024.   He has implored the court to grant prayer No. 3 on the face of the application.
  3. Clearly, there is no response to the application herein. The respondents were made aware of the existence of the application and the suit but opted not to respond to the same; see Ogada-vs-Mollin 2009) KLR 620.
  4. It is noteworthy that the applicants commenced this suit by way of a plaint (Fast Track) dated 3rd November 2023 seeking the orders infra;- (a) A declaration that Johana Mwita (deceased) held the suit land measuring approximately 10.40 HA in trust and for benefit of his four brothers who all deceased and dependants.  (b) A declaration that the Plaintiffs right over the suit land and resultant subdivisions are adverse to the rights of the 1st to 7th defendants all-inclusive over the same.
  5. This court has the mandate to grant interim preservation orders as provided for under section 13 (7) (a) of the Environment and Land Court Act 2015 (2011).
  6. In the circumstances, the applicants are deserving of an order of status quo over the suit land worthwhile.
  7. Thus, the application is determined in terms of status quo to be maintained over the suit land pending the outcome of this suit.  In particular, the parties shall not sell, lease, charge, transfer or subdivide the suit land during the pendency of the suit.
  8. It is so ordered.

DATED AND DELIVERED AT MIGORI THIS 24th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024

G. M. A. ONGONDO

JUDGE

In Present of;-

Mr E. Kisia learned counsel for the applicants/ Plaintiffs

Tom- Court Assistant

Details

Delivered

Related decisions

Published for information only — not legal advice. Check the official record before relying on this text. Talk to an advocate