' RULING ON ADJOURNMENT
I have perused this file and indeed, there is no evidence that the firm of Morara was on record necessitating change of advocates.
I have also confirmed that the application which is due for hearing today was served upon the Respondents in July 2024 and not 19/8/2025 and that even after a hearing notice was served on 19/8/2025, no response has been filed and no plausible reason is advanced to warrant this court grant more time to the Respondents to file a response to the application.
The decree which is before this court is more than 10 years and no effort has been made to settle the same. I find the request by Ms. Mogere for the Respondents to be unacceptable and devoid of substantive.
I decline to adjourn the hearing of the application dated 26/7/2024 and direct that the hearing proceeds. Ms. Mogere is granted leave to respond orally on any points of law that may be raised in the application.
I so order.
Dated, Signed and Delivered virtually at Nairobi this 29 th Day of September, 2025
'
I have perused this file and indeed, there is no evidence that the firm of Morara was on record necessitating change of advocates.
I have also confirmed that the application which is due for hearing today was served upon the Respondents in July 2024 and not 19/8/2025 and that even after a hearing notice was served on 19/8/2025, no response has been filed and no plausible reason is advanced to warrant this court grant more time to the Respondents to file a response to the application.
The decree which is before this court is more than 10 years and no effort has been made to settle the same. I find the request by Ms. Mogere for the Respondents to be unacceptable and devoid of substantive.
I decline to adjourn the hearing of the application dated 26/7/2024 and direct that the hearing proceeds. Ms. Mogere is granted leave to respond orally on any points of law that may be raised in the application.
I so order.
Dated, Signed and Delivered virtually at Nairobi this 29 th Day of September, 2025
'