The applicant in thus matter seeks to have his sentence of 30 years reviewed by this court.
The sentence was imposed by Hon. Justice D.O Ogembo after the applicant had entered into a plea of bargain.
The applicant has urged this court to consider resentencing him.
The reason he stated is that he did not appeal against the sentence.
This court has been urged by the prosecution to decline the request for review of sentence on the basis that this court has no jurisdiction to review the sentence imposed by a judge of concurrent jurisdiction.
It is not disputed that the sentence was imposed by a Judge of this court thus the court is strictly speaking functus officio on the issue of sentence.
The law on plea bargain only allows an accused person the right of appeal against sentence under Section 137L and only limited to the extent or legality of the sentence.
A review of the sentence by the same court is not one of the options open to an accused.
The court thus lack jurisdiction and since jurisdiction can only flow from the constitution or statute, none of that is available to come to the aid of the applicant.
In Owners of Motor Vessel “Lillian S” Vs Caltex Oil Ltd (1989) KLR the Court of Appeal held that jurisdiction is everything and without it a court must down its tools.
Having determined that this court has no jurisdiction to review the sentence. the application is accordingly struck out.
It is so ordered.
The sentence was imposed by Hon. Justice D.O Ogembo after the applicant had entered into a plea of bargain.
The applicant has urged this court to consider resentencing him.
The reason he stated is that he did not appeal against the sentence.
This court has been urged by the prosecution to decline the request for review of sentence on the basis that this court has no jurisdiction to review the sentence imposed by a judge of concurrent jurisdiction.
It is not disputed that the sentence was imposed by a Judge of this court thus the court is strictly speaking functus officio on the issue of sentence.
The law on plea bargain only allows an accused person the right of appeal against sentence under Section 137L and only limited to the extent or legality of the sentence.
A review of the sentence by the same court is not one of the options open to an accused.
The court thus lack jurisdiction and since jurisdiction can only flow from the constitution or statute, none of that is available to come to the aid of the applicant.
In Owners of Motor Vessel “Lillian S” Vs Caltex Oil Ltd (1989) KLR the Court of Appeal held that jurisdiction is everything and without it a court must down its tools.
Having determined that this court has no jurisdiction to review the sentence. the application is accordingly struck out.
It is so ordered.