Skip to content
JudgmentE-kati Hauliers Limited VS Richard Mutinda Muteti AND Peter Ngui Mwololo1 min read

E-kati Hauliers Limited VS Richard Mutinda Muteti AND Peter Ngui Mwololo

Employment and Labour Relations Court at Malindi ELRC · · Ocharo Kebira

Summary

The court dismissed an application to transfer two employment causes (E005 of 2023 and E006 of 2023) from the Principal Magistrate’s Court at Kaloleni, Kilifi County to the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Makindu, Makueni County. The Applicant sought transfer based on the claim of the cause of action arising in Emali Town, where the Respondent’s transportation business headquarters is located. The court found the application lacked merit because it misapplied the Employment and Labour Relations Court’s Procedure Rules, which allow the Claimant to initiate suits in the County where they reside or carry on business, rather than relying on outdated Civil Procedure Act provisions. The court emphasized that the Rules of this Court supersede the Civil Procedure Act and that the application ignored this progressive provision.

1   By the Notice of Motion application dated 7TH May 2025, the Applicant sought that this Court order the transfer of Employment Cause No. E005 of 2023 and E. OO6 OF 2023 pending before the Principal Magistrate’s Court at Kaloleni, Kilifi County, to the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Makindu, Makueni County.
2  The application is anchored on the prime ground that the cause of action arose in Emali Town within the jurisdiction of the Makindu Chief Magistrate’s Court, and that the Respondent conducts its transportation business and has its Headquarters at Emali Town, Makueni County.
3 The Respondents vehemently oppose the application.
4 I have carefully considered the application, the grounds on which it is premised, the supporting affidavit, and the replying affidavit. Without hesitation, I state that the application is a good candidate for failure.
5 Rule 6 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court [Procedure] Rules, 2024 allows the Claimant, Petitioner or Applicant, as the case may be, to initiate a suit at the registry with respect to the County where he or she resides or carries on business or personally works for gain. The Applicant’s application is ignorant of this progressive and equitable provision. The tragedy of it is that it relies on the stipulations of Section 15[1] of the Civil Procedure Act, which are radically different from those of the Rule.
6  Essentially, the application does not recognise that the Rules of this Court have been drafted and implemented under the authority of the Employment and Labour Relations Court, a subsequent Act of Parliament relative to the Civil Procedure Act.
7 In the upshot, I find this application lacking in merit. It is hereby dismissed. This file is marked closed.
Read, signed and delivered virtually in Mombasa this 19 June, 2025.